VIKTOR FRANKL LECTURE

The following lecture was presented by Viktor Frankl, MD, on November 14, 1980, in Atlanta, Georgia. He spoke to a group of mental health-care professionals from a variety of mental health institutions and private practices. I was privileged to attend. I taped his presentation, with his permission, and later had my secretary, Elma Hill, transcribe it. I then edited it for readability.

Dr. Frankl was among the most important people of the 20th Century. He was a victim of the Nazis in the concentration camps. He was Jewish, and along with the others, suffered horrors with which the world has not yet completely reconciled. Like the book of  Job in the Old Testament, which dealt with the meaning of suffering, Frankl and other Holocaust Jews suffered horribly. However, because Frankl had the specialized training in psychiatry and medicine—and he survived the Nazi horrors—he was able to see aspects of suffering that seemed to elude the writer of Job. In any event he was able to put a more modern, scientific slant on it. His reflections on his personal suffering led him to write the book, Man’s Search For Meaning. He later developed a type of therapy, which he called logotherapy, and spent the rest of his life treating patients, writing, and lecturing. I highly recommend all of his writings for those interested, with Man’s Search For Meaning being sufficient for the general reader interested in the concept of: Why do good people have to suffer, and what can we do about it?

 

LECTURE

 

Speaking of counseling centers, I am reminded of the fact that late in the 1920’s I founded, organized, and directed the Youth Counseling Centers in Vienna, after a pattern in several other cities, all capitols of Europe. These centers had already been organized, and I then reported statistically on what had happened throughout these centers in the ensuing years in psychoanalytic journals. And it turned out that most of the people who had consulted these centers had come mostly because of sexual problems.

Then, about fifty years ago, a teacher in Vienna presented me with another study which showed a drastic change. He had invited his students to ask him questions about what was on their minds. There were questions about sex and drugs— and questions such as, “Is there life on other planets?” However, the most frequently asked questions regarded suicide among students thirteen to fourteen years of age! I suppose that now you’ll have an understanding of my contention that the scenery has markedly changed since the times of Sigmund Freud.

No longer is sex the main problem today—but existential questions are paramount! Questions, which according to the philosopher Camus, are the real philosophical concerns: whether life is worthwhile—or is suicide the one thing to commit? No longer, as in the times of psychiatrist Alfred Adler, are inferiority feelings driving our patients to psychologists and psychiatrists, but it is feelings of futility, a feeling of meaninglessness, combined with emptiness—what I have come to call the “existential vacuum.”

I coined this term “existential vacuum” as early as 1955, and since that time it has become widespread and a worldwide phenomenon. And it is worldwide, which can be seen from the fact that it is in no way restricted to our western world or culture, but it makes itself noticed in every communist country and in the third world. All this is evidenced in the scientific literature, by publications throughout communist countries and the third world. A dissertation by Dianna Young of the University of California at Berkley, shows that it is particularly the young generation that is afflicted so much by this present state of affairs, and this evidence is supported and confirmed by something that psychologist Harold Marshall, a counselor in Belleview, Washington, found out: mainly, that those in their thirties who come in for help have a sense of purposelessness, and this deteriorates into depression.

Now, speaking of depression, what comes to mind is what I usually call the “mass-erupted triad,’ mainly depression, aggression, and addiction. Let me report to you what happened a couple of years ago when a lecture of mine was scheduled in Athens, Georgia, at the University of Georgia, upon the invitation of the student body. They wrote to me that I should come, and insisted that I had to lecture under the title, Is The New Generation Mad? I was very resistant, but I couldn’t help it; I had to lecture on this subject.

Arriving in Atlanta there was a thunderstorm and the plane from Atlanta to Athens was cancelled, so I had to take a taxi at the last moment. The driver asked me several times, “What are you doing in Athens in such bad weather?” I said I had to give a lecture.

“A  lecture? Aha, upon what subject are you going to speak?”

I replied, “The title of my lecture is “Is The New generation Mad?” I told him not to laugh. “I’ll make you the final composer. I’ll take over the taxi driving and you take over my lecture.”

“Oh, I couldn’t do that,” he replied.

“Why not?” I asked. “You are much closer to the situation of the young generation than I am—and I have just arrived from Vienna!”

“Oh, I couldn’t do that.”

“Now, why don’t you tell me then, what do you believe? Is the new generation mad?”

You know what he said, literally! “Of course they’re mad. They kill themselves, they kill each other, and they take dope!”

Depression, aggression, and addiction!

How should we cope today with this mass feeling of emptiness and meaninglessness? It is very hard to do because our industrial society is eager to satisfy virtually any and every need. The consumer society of today creates, rather than just satisfies needs. And one need is forgotten—even overlooked! The most important human need, the most specific human need. This is frustrating. It is the need to see and fulfill in one’s life a meaning, a function, a mission, an assignment. This is the will to meaning, as I call it, and it is being frustrated by society and psychological science.

Due to certain reasons, which I am going to discuss later on, science and its technology supplies us with the means to live, but it cannot offer us a meaning to live for. Let me quote something a Nobel Prize physicist once allowed: “The world of natural science is lacking in whatever relates to the meaning and purpose of hope. And a similar statement has been made by Einstein.”

Now, the fact has to be acknowledged and faced that science cannot offer you any meaning and purpose. But even worse, the way in which science is transmitted in spirit to our youngsters on most of our campuses, the way young people are being indoctrinated, is such that their natural and original enthusiasm, or idealism, is undermined and eroded because of what is called reductionism. You see, often people are deploring the fact that, increasingly, scientists are specializing, losing sight of the larger picture. This is nothing to be deplored, as I see it, but what is to be deplored is just the contrary—that so many scientists who are specialists are generalizing! They are coming up with over- generalized statements about things they know little about.

Let me give you an example. My natural science teacher in high school was marching up and down the rows of students, speaking in that detached manner of his, which was so typical of the scientists of his day, poker-faced, teaching us that life, in the ultimate analysis, is nothing but a combustion process—or oxidation! I immediately jumped on my feet and threw this question to his face, “If that is so, what meaning then does our life have?” He couldn’t answer that question because he was a reductionist—or should I say an oxidationist!

One book review on Goethe goes as follows: “In the 1530 pages of this book the author portrays to us a genius, Goethe, with earmarks of mania, depression, paranoia, epileptic disorder, homosexuality, incest, voyeurism, fetishism, impotence, narcissism, obsession, compulsive neurosis, hysteria, megalomania, etc.” The author seems to focus almost exclusively upon the instinctive dynamic forces that underlie artistic problems. We are led to believe that Goethe’s work is but the result of pre-genital extensions, that he does not really aim for an idea of beauty, but for the overcoming of the embarrassing problem of premature ejaculation! This is a flagrant instance of reductionism, reducing everything down to a lower dimension.

In another book you come across the following definition of man:  “Man is nothing but a biochemically complex mechanism, powered by a combustion system, with the storage facilities for retaining and coding information.” That’s all there is to a human being, apparently.

(At this point Frankel went to a blackboard and drew a picture of cube, casting a shadow, which was a two dimensional square. Then he drew a picture of a three dimensional cylinder, which could cast two shadows: a rectangle or a circle, depending on the direction of the light source.)

Now, do not misunderstand what I am intending to say; after all I am a professor of neurology. I stand for the legitimacy to interpret the central nervous system of man in terms of action, functions, or, in computer terms. But at the same time, I insist that a computer of the human being is also more than a computer. You see, in a way, the computer is included in the human brain. But if you take a three dimensional cube and shine a light on it, it will cast only a two dimensional shadow of a square, but we know that the cube is more than its shadow. In a way the cube also is  the square, because it contains the two dimensional square, but at the same time you will note the cube is more than the square. From this projection—which is the essence of reductionism–what results is a contradiction.

Now I hope you are able to follow me with my figures I have drawn. Now you see a rectangle and a circle. In this context they are contradictions, but my contention is that the contradictions seem not to contradict the oneness of a phenomenon that is so contradictorily depicted. As you can see, the three dimensional cylinder can cast two different types of shadows: a circle and a rectangle, which are different projections (shadows) of the one cylinder,  depending on the direction of the light source. However, the circle and the rectangle are absolutely different. Now, you can well see that these two contradictions all are projections (shadows) of the one and same cylinder. Here we are taking a three dimensional object and reducing it down to two two-dimensional representations.

The same now holds for the human being. If you project a human being out of his full dimensionality into a dimension lower than his own, the result is either a biological or a psychological projection. In other words, the oneness of the human being necessarily disappears, because the oneness is only perceptible and noticeable in the next higher image, in the three dimensional space where the cylinder is residing. But as to man, the full dimension of the human phenomenon has been shut out of the realm where the dimension of his search for meaning is residing.  That is why you have to open up this dimension. You have to enter this human dimension. You have to follow man into his human dimension, if for no other reason than to understand his motivation, because unless you understand one’s motivation you are incapable of overcoming his frustration. So, you have to enter the human dimension to become cognizant of the way to meaning, and to become able to cope with the ills and ailments of our time. If one’s will to meaning is being satisfied then that human being becomes happy—only not by striving for happiness, but by pursuing meaning, because happiness only helps you as a side effect. Now, since a human being, whose will- to-meaning is being satisfied, also becomes happy, at the same time it is most interesting that he also becomes capable of suffering, of enduring tensions and frustrations, and eventually he is prepared to give his life.

Consider the various political resistance movements throughout the world and throughout history. If one’s will to meaning is being frustrated and remains unsatisfied, then one is inclined to take one’s life—and will do it in the midst of, and in spite of, affluence and welfare. What I want to convey to you is that people might have the means to live, but unless they also have a means to live for, they are threatened by depression and suicide.

Now, let us ask for a moment how it is that a psychology that is fascinated by the pattern of natural science, that such a psychology is ignoring these concepts such as meaning and purpose. I’ll try to show why this is happening.

The observation of any process immediately influences a process itself. Now, what about psychological processes? You see, the observing eye of the psychologist is fascinated by the natural science model. He observes the human being, and the human being is the subject–but the observation changes the person  into a mere object. Now, it is my personal theory that it is the essence of the subject that it has an object of its own. What do I mean by that? I just mean that the existential thinker sees the intentionality of man as an activity which focuses on something, or someone beyond himself. He sees the essence of the human being basically not concerned with anything within himself, but, on the contrary, he’s reaching beyond himself to meanings to fulfill, to other human beings to love. Now this intentionality, or this directiveness toward objects of its own, is benign, shut out, and excluded and cut off from the subject by its being made into an object. And what it finally does is that in the world in which a human being exists, and this is called being in the world, and this being with other people, rather than being concerned with homeostasis, satisfaction of drives, needs and, conditioning, etc., is being shut out.

Nevertheless, this would constitute the reasons of my act; I’m acting to a world rather than reacting to stimuli, rather than reacting to instincts and drives. The psychodynamic model depicts man abreacting to tensions. The behaviorist model depicts man as reacting to stimuli. But actually man is neither abreacting nor reacting, but is acting, and he is acting into a world of fellow human beings and of meaning, and this is shut out, so they have no reasons to act and behave. And what remains instead of the reasons are causes. Is there a difference between a reason for acting or a cause that propels me to act? There is a difference. If you cut onions, you start to cry. Your tears have a cause, but your tears have no reason. If you’re crying because your loved one has died, you would have a reason to cry. With onions it is just a cause for your tears. In other words, now that man has been made into an object there are no reasons out in the world, but only causes that call one to behave one way or the other. The causes have to be hypothesized in terms of drives, instincts, conditioning, and learning processes, so this is no longer a human being that you are doing psychology about. I hope I can make myself understood this way.

If we wish to re-humanize psychotherapy, we have to follow man into the human dimension, to become cognizant of his meaning orientation rather than his drive and instincts. Is this to say that we just dismiss science and scientific methodology? Not at all. We just have to overcome the one-sidedness.

Out of research has come the notion that meaning is available to each and every person, irrespective of his or her IQ, character structure, educationbal background, environment, etc. Even in the ghetto, meaning is available in principle, irrespective of whether one is religious or not. And if someone is religious, irrespective of the denomination to which he or she belongs, one can find meaning and principle under their religion.

More than that, we have wandered aimlessly when dealing with taboos. I came across a novel where I found the following sentence: “There is a subject nowadays which is taboo, in a way that sexuality was once taboo, which is to talk about life as if it had any meaning.” If you ask me how meaning can be found unconditionally, how it is possible that meaning can be found literally at one’s last breath, this is due to the fact that there are three avenues leading up to a meaningful life.

First, by doing the deeds created in your work, life can be made beautiful, not only in work but also in experiencing the beauty in your work and the world in general– the good in the world. Next, in experiencing not something, but someone— encountering another human being in his or her very uniqueness, which is the definition of love. Loving means experiencing another human being and becoming aware of the uniqueness of that other person.

So, we see work and love make life meaningful, but beyond that, the third avenue is that potential meaning can be found if we are caught as the helpless victims of a hopeless situation, facing an unchangeable fate. If we are caught or confronted with the fact that we are incurably ill, then there is the possibility that we bear witness to the uniquely human capacity to turn a personal predicament into a human achievement, to turn a tragedy into a triumph. And this is possible to the last breath, because even death offers an opportunity to bear witness to what a human being is capable of. It is not by coincidence that death is the final stage of growing. Even death allows for rising above one’s situation, thereby growing beyond one’s self. If we watch simple people or noble people, we may see how capable they are of turning tragedy into person triumphs, how they are capable of squeezing out meaning from the most miserable or most trivial situations.

 

Several years ago a garbage collector received the Order of Merit from the German government. This man did his job to everyone’s satisfaction, but the special effort that gave him the reward was this: He looked through the garbage for discarded toys, spent his evening hours to repair them, and gave them to poor children as presents. As a fix-it man, he added to his clean-up job a magnificent meaning.

Another man, a doctor, examined a Jewish woman who wore a bracelet. The doctor admired the bracelet, and she said the parts of the bracelet belonged to the nine children who had been killed in the Nazi gas chambers. Shocked, the doctor asked her how she could live with such a bracelet. Quietly, the Jewish woman replied, “You see, I am now in charge of an orphanage in Israel.” People are capable of squeezing out meanings of a most tragic situation. Situations that may not be able to be changed, but you can change yourself to rise above the situation and to grow beyond yourself.

There was a question that is asked: “So, do you believe that suffering is necessary in order to arrive at meaning?” My contention is that meaning is possible– in spite of suffering!

After watching the Holocaust, a Polish man involved in carrying out mass executions was asked for his reaction. He was the military organizer of the Warsaw upheaval.  He said that taking a gun and shooting someone was no  great thing. But if the SS leads you to a mass grave to execute you on the spot, or if the SS drives you to a gas chamber, and you cannot do anything about it except for keeping your head high and going your way with dignity, this is what I call a human achievement. The highest dignity goes to those who cannot do anything about their hopeless situation, but keep their heads high.

Essentially, life remains meaningful unconditionally. In other words, meaning is inexhaustible. But what is inexhaustible is energy. We live in an age of energy crises and shortages. We’re living in a post-petroleum society, as it were. Now, you see, I believe that the energy crisis is not only a threat, but offers a chance that the accent and impulses of people may shift from the means to live to a meaning to live for. This emphasis may be shifted from material goods to existential needs. Let me say that I regard the movement toward logotherapy really to be one of the human rights movements, because the focus is on the intrinsically and fundamental human rights to a life as meaningful as possible, and I think psychotherapy and counseling should do justice to this special human rights.

Now I will take questions.

QUESTION: Dr. Frankl, I’ve studied your theory of paradoxical intention and it seems that you are talking about lives reaching the point of spontaneity. Am I not mistaken that in your theory of paradoxical intention, that when you alleviate the pressure of fear or failure of a person going to sleep or sweating or stuttering, that you are really bringing that person to a point of spontaneity, and that in your logotherapy you are trying to give that person life and meaning so that he can become more spontaneous. Is that basically what you are saying?

ANSWER: Yes. What you’re saying is very interesting and a remarkable contribution to the interpretation of what really goes on in meaning-oriented logotherapy, and in that aspect of logotherapy, which deals on a more down-to-earth clinical level with phobias, obsessive compulsive neurosis, etc. My own interpretation is a bit different, but I am not the best and greatest master in practicing paradoxical intention. Other people do it much better.

QUESTION: The reason I ask you this is that I teach behavioral science to corporations, and I use your theory of paradoxical intention to eliminate the stress that executives and marketing people have been getting  to take the pressure off of fear and failure, quota systems, competitive systems, and to relate to your thirteen and fourteen year old suicidal people. I think they’re crying out for relief from the competitive system—the fear of failure—that they can’t compete, and so, consequently, they turn to drugs and suicide and what have you, and I use your theory in my work to help executives.

ANSWER: Paradoxical intention and logotherapy are moving in two direction. Paradoxical intention often remains in the psychological dimension. Many behaviors are successfully using and propagating paradoxical intention without caring for logotherapy, without caring for that dimension in which  the search for meaning exists. And I would say that there are many statistics to the effect that 90% of students attempting suicide did so because they couldn’t see meaning in their lives. I personally don’t think that suicide is due to the lack of meaning. It might be due to various reasons. When suicide attempts are not undertaken because of lack of meaning, it might well indicate that there were visions of a meaning to life of some sort, and this could have helped the respective individual to overcome the inclination to suicide. So, in such cases where people are depressed, one should not try to apply paradoxical intention to circumvent the fear of failure, but in the first place one might have to show and persuade the individual that there is also meaning to his life, and if he becomes cognizant of this, meaning he will be capable of tolerating some tensions and frustrations and not be so afraid of failure, because he would say in even cases of failure there is a lot of meaning and potential.

QUESTION: Aren’t you really saying that the person must be satisfied with himself before he can really obtain the potential of his achievements, because of the fact that he is a unique individual? Uniqueness in today’s schools is squashed. The talented, personable child is sitting in the principal’s office most of the time. Conformity is the rule. I think in order to change this we must change the values of what a child thinks success and failure are, because this is what he determines his behavior patterns by. Do you agree with this?

ANSWER: This, in a sense, I would subscribe to. But, you see, it is not is a matter of hierarchy of values, because what logotherapy is ultimately pleading for is the recognition that even the failure—or in spite of failure—meaning can be found. So people should not idealize, should not make success into an ultimate goal. They should not make success the peak of the hierarchy. This is the main misunderstanding—especially in America. People are pursuing happiness and success, but both should not be the peak of the hierarchy. Meaning, fulfillment and loving encounter are much more important, and on the contrary, striving for both success and happiness are elusive and self-defeating. If you will forgive my becoming a bit personal, I wrote a book within nine days in 1945 without my name printed on it. I wanted the book to be published anonymously, with the absolute determination and conviction that that way would not attribute anything to my reputation as a psychiatrist, but for the sake of telling people it is possible—even in the situation of Auswitz—not to doubt that life has meaning up to the last moment, and to persuade the people of that. In that book, and all our books together, this one book that I wrote within nine days with conviction was published, to become a great success. However, the less you care for success, the sooner success will come to you naturally, automatically. The less you care for your potency, in sexual pleasure and orgasm, the more you will have potency and you will have your orgasm. The more you are concerned with your potency, the more you are doomed to impotency. Love is the direction of our day-to-day practice, and you will be dismissed as a status seeker if you strive only for success. But if you let success and happiness come to you, then you’ll be much better off.

QUESTION: Would we be better off then if we didn’t teach our children success and failure as we know it today, and more that we should teach them spontaneity of their uniqueness and individuality, and let happiness be a bi-product of their spontaneity?

ANSWER: Success and happiness must remain a bi-product rather than being pursued. Let me add a warning: by spontaneity you are moving in the direction of identity and self-actualization, and if anyone should misinterpret your words let me say also that identity and self-actualization can be brought about by not caring for them. The more you love someone else the more you become happy and the more you’re actualizing yourself, and you’re finally arriving at your identity, but what is valid in no place more than in this context are the wonderful words of a German philosopher saying, “What a man is, is that he becomes  the cause which he has adopted to his own.

QUESTION: For every situation you speak of there being only one solution that is right, and we may not find that meaning, but that does not alleviate our responsibility to try to find the “one” meaning. This idea of one meaning doesn’t seem to fit into my notion or understanding of existentialism, whereby there is a situation where there is no solution and you give meaning to it yourself. If that is true then how can you find what would be the “one” meaning for each situation?

ANSWER : Potential meaning is dormant in children in a way comparable to a Gestalt figure. In a Gestalt figure you suddenly become aware of a figure against a background, but in a meaning-finding process you suddenly become aware of a possibility against the background of reality—namely the possibility to change reality. Now, if you’re confronted with this situation, there are alternatives, and if you go through all those alternatives you will find there is one solution to the problem. This cannot be done on rational terms. You have to rely on intuition and that organ, the brain, which is wired into the human being in ways that are usually referred to as our conscience. Conscience usually says to you—without having to think—what to do. There is just not subjective meaning here. There is a subjective meaningfulness available by drug usage, where suddenly everything becomes “meaningful.” But this is not true meaning. True meanings are objective, in as much as they have to be found and experienced, rather than being freely, arbitrarily attributed to the world or situations outside the person.

QUESTION: In reading your books over the years, and being very in touch with the issue of meaning, it confuses me that your theory seems to be so ethically neutral. You just touched on true meaning. Were not the guards in the camps where you were a prisioner, from their point of view, leading a meaningful life? I’d like to ask you what is the difference in a meaningful life and a good life. When I think of a meaningful life I think of Albert Switzer or Mother Teresa. I immediately assume that meaning is good, but if you’re suggesting that each of us needs to discover a meaning for ourselves without a moral context or some moral overview in which to value whether what I’m doing is meaningful and is good or wrong, then why not supply my own private meaning,  with my existential vacuum in danger of being filled possibly by a very lousy ethical attitude. Wasn’t Hitler’s demonic genius fulfilling the young Germans to a very meaningful life, as they understood it?

ANSWER: Each person in each situation offers different meaning. I’ve already intimated that it is our conscience that helps intuitively to get hold of or to grasp the meaning of the moment, in contrast to ultimate meaning or super-meaning. The conscience, in contrast to what is called a superego, might well be the result of a conditioning process. True conscience is a specifically human phenomenon, but, alas, it is also  too bound up to human frailty, limitations, incompleteness, and insufficiency. In other words, our conscience may err, and up to the last moment, up to our lying or our deathbeds, we’ll never know absolutely whether our conscience is right or not. This I regard as the principle assignment of education, not only to transmit knowledge and tradition, but also to refine our conscience so that we become able, under certain conditions, to find out our true meanings, even in tragic situations. And if you ask me an interesting sociological phenomenon, that no one has asked in Germany, but which I have been asked in America, “What would you have told Adolph Hitler if he came to your office and asked about the meaning of his life, and what should he do to obey his conscience?” Obviously, in this case of Hitler, I would have handed out the admonition that he obey his conscience, but to also carefully listen to it, because it is inconceivable to me that if Hitler had really listened to his conscience, he would never have become the monster that he was. And his conscience, in the final analysis, would have told him to try another way to re-establish that reputation of national Germany—not through a World War, genocide, etc. He would have arrived at another means. And that is the answer if you ask me such a difficult question and wish me immediately to come up with an over-simplified answer. This is also my answer to the problem of terrorism. The terrorists are living in an existential vacuum, and they try to find a mission in their lives. But if they will listen to their consciences they will become aware that there are two types of politics, two types of politicians. One  adheres to the principle that the goal justifies the means, while the other remains aware that there are means that desecrate even the most noble aim.

.

CONCLUSION OF LECTURE

.

The following lecture was presented by Viktor Frankl, MD, on November 14, 1980, in Atlanta, Georgia. He spoke to a group of mental health-care professionals from a variety of mental health institutions and private practices. I was privileged to attend. I taped his presentation, with his permission, and later had my secretary, Elma Hill, transcribe it. I then edited it for readability.

Dr. Frankl was among the most important people of the 20th Century. He was a victim of the Nazis in the concentration camps. He was Jewish, and along with the others, suffered horrors with which the world has not yet completely reconciled. Like the book of  Job in the Old Testament, which dealt with the meaning of suffering, Frankl and other Holocaust Jews suffered horribly. However, because Frankl had the specialized training in psychiatry and medicine—and he survived the Nazi horrors—he was able to see aspects of suffering that seemed to elude the writer of Job. In any event he was able to put a more modern, scientific slant on it. His reflections on his personal suffering led him to write the book, Man’s Search For Meaning. He later developed a type of therapy, which he called logotherapy, and spent the rest of his life treating patients, writing, and lecturing. I highly recommend all of his writings for those interested, with Man’s Search For Meaning being sufficient for the general reader interested in the concept of: Why do good people have to suffer, and what can we do about it?

 

LECTURE

 

Speaking of counseling centers, I am reminded of the fact that late in the 1920’s I founded, organized, and directed the Youth Counseling Centers in Vienna, after a pattern in several other cities, all capitols of Europe. These centers had already been organized, and I then reported statistically on what had happened throughout these centers in the ensuing years in psychoanalytic journals. And it turned out that most of the people who had consulted these centers had come mostly because of sexual problems.

Then, about fifty years ago, a teacher in Vienna presented me with another study which showed a drastic change. He had invited his students to ask him questions about what was on their minds. There were questions about sex and drugs— and questions such as, “Is there life on other planets?” However, the most frequently asked questions regarded suicide among students thirteen to fourteen years of age! I suppose that now you’ll have an understanding of my contention that the scenery has markedly changed since the times of Sigmund Freud.

No longer is sex the main problem today—but existential questions are paramount! Questions, which according to the philosopher Camus, are the real philosophical concerns: whether life is worthwhile—or is suicide the one thing to commit? No longer, as in the times of psychiatrist Alfred Adler, are inferiority feelings driving our patients to psychologists and psychiatrists, but it is feelings of futility, a feeling of meaninglessness, combined with emptiness—what I have come to call the “existential vacuum.”

I coined this term “existential vacuum” as early as 1955, and since that time it has become widespread and a worldwide phenomenon. And it is worldwide, which can be seen from the fact that it is in no way restricted to our western world or culture, but it makes itself noticed in every communist country and in the third world. All this is evidenced in the scientific literature, by publications throughout communist countries and the third world. A dissertation by Dianna Young of the University of California at Berkley, shows that it is particularly the young generation that is afflicted so much by this present state of affairs, and this evidence is supported and confirmed by something that psychologist Harold Marshall, a counselor in Belleview, Washington, found out: mainly, that those in their thirties who come in for help have a sense of purposelessness, and this deteriorates into depression.

Now, speaking of depression, what comes to mind is what I usually call the “mass-erupted triad,’ mainly depression, aggression, and addiction. Let me report to you what happened a couple of years ago when a lecture of mine was scheduled in Athens, Georgia, at the University of Georgia, upon the invitation of the student body. They wrote to me that I should come, and insisted that I had to lecture under the title, Is The New Generation Mad? I was very resistant, but I couldn’t help it; I had to lecture on this subject.

Arriving in Atlanta there was a thunderstorm and the plane from Atlanta to Athens was cancelled, so I had to take a taxi at the last moment. The driver asked me several times, “What are you doing in Athens in such bad weather?” I said I had to give a lecture.

“A  lecture? Aha, upon what subject are you going to speak?”

I replied, “The title of my lecture is “Is The New generation Mad?” I told him not to laugh. “I’ll make you the final composer. I’ll take over the taxi driving and you take over my lecture.”

“Oh, I couldn’t do that,” he replied.

“Why not?” I asked. “You are much closer to the situation of the young generation than I am—and I have just arrived from Vienna!”

“Oh, I couldn’t do that.”

“Now, why don’t you tell me then, what do you believe? Is the new generation mad?”

You know what he said, literally! “Of course they’re mad. They kill themselves, they kill each other, and they take dope!”

Depression, aggression, and addiction!

How should we cope today with this mass feeling of emptiness and meaninglessness? It is very hard to do because our industrial society is eager to satisfy virtually any and every need. The consumer society of today creates, rather than just satisfies needs. And one need is forgotten—even overlooked! The most important human need, the most specific human need. This is frustrating. It is the need to see and fulfill in one’s life a meaning, a function, a mission, an assignment. This is the will to meaning, as I call it, and it is being frustrated by society and psychological science.

Due to certain reasons, which I am going to discuss later on, science and its technology supplies us with the means to live, but it cannot offer us a meaning to live for. Let me quote something a Nobel Prize physicist once allowed: “The world of natural science is lacking in whatever relates to the meaning and purpose of hope. And a similar statement has been made by Einstein.”

Now, the fact has to be acknowledged and faced that science cannot offer you any meaning and purpose. But even worse, the way in which science is transmitted in spirit to our youngsters on most of our campuses, the way young people are being indoctrinated, is such that their natural and original enthusiasm, or idealism, is undermined and eroded because of what is called reductionism. You see, often people are deploring the fact that, increasingly, scientists are specializing, losing sight of the larger picture. This is nothing to be deplored, as I see it, but what is to be deplored is just the contrary—that so many scientists who are specialists are generalizing! They are coming up with over- generalized statements about things they know little about.

Let me give you an example. My natural science teacher in high school was marching up and down the rows of students, speaking in that detached manner of his, which was so typical of the scientists of his day, poker-faced, teaching us that life, in the ultimate analysis, is nothing but a combustion process—or oxidation! I immediately jumped on my feet and threw this question to his face, “If that is so, what meaning then does our life have?” He couldn’t answer that question because he was a reductionist—or should I say an oxidationist!

One book review on Goethe goes as follows: “In the 1530 pages of this book the author portrays to us a genius, Goethe, with earmarks of mania, depression, paranoia, epileptic disorder, homosexuality, incest, voyeurism, fetishism, impotence, narcissism, obsession, compulsive neurosis, hysteria, megalomania, etc.” The author seems to focus almost exclusively upon the instinctive dynamic forces that underlie artistic problems. We are led to believe that Goethe’s work is but the result of pre-genital extensions, that he does not really aim for an idea of beauty, but for the overcoming of the embarrassing problem of premature ejaculation! This is a flagrant instance of reductionism, reducing everything down to a lower dimension.

In another book you come across the following definition of man:  “Man is nothing but a biochemically complex mechanism, powered by a combustion system, with the storage facilities for retaining and coding information.” That’s all there is to a human being, apparently.

(At this point Frankel went to a blackboard and drew a picture of cube, casting a shadow, which was a two dimensional square. Then he drew a picture of a three dimensional cylinder, which could cast two shadows: a rectangle or a circle, depending on the direction of the light source.)

Now, do not misunderstand what I am intending to say; after all I am a professor of neurology. I stand for the legitimacy to interpret the central nervous system of man in terms of action, functions, or, in computer terms. But at the same time, I insist that a computer of the human being is also more than a computer. You see, in a way, the computer is included in the human brain. But if you take a three dimensional cube and shine a light on it, it will cast only a two dimensional shadow of a square, but we know that the cube is more than its shadow. In a way the cube also is  the square, because it contains the two dimensional square, but at the same time you will note the cube is more than the square. From this projection—which is the essence of reductionism–what results is a contradiction.

Now I hope you are able to follow me with my figures I have drawn. Now you see a rectangle and a circle. In this context they are contradictions, but my contention is that the contradictions seem not to contradict the oneness of a phenomenon that is so contradictorily depicted. As you can see, the three dimensional cylinder can cast two different types of shadows: a circle and a rectangle, which are different projections (shadows) of the one cylinder,  depending on the direction of the light source. However, the circle and the rectangle are absolutely different. Now, you can well see that these two contradictions all are projections (shadows) of the one and same cylinder. Here we are taking a three dimensional object and reducing it down to two two-dimensional representations.

The same now holds for the human being. If you project a human being out of his full dimensionality into a dimension lower than his own, the result is either a biological or a psychological projection. In other words, the oneness of the human being necessarily disappears, because the oneness is only perceptible and noticeable in the next higher image, in the three dimensional space where the cylinder is residing. But as to man, the full dimension of the human phenomenon has been shut out of the realm where the dimension of his search for meaning is residing.  That is why you have to open up this dimension. You have to enter this human dimension. You have to follow man into his human dimension, if for no other reason than to understand his motivation, because unless you understand one’s motivation you are incapable of overcoming his frustration. So, you have to enter the human dimension to become cognizant of the way to meaning, and to become able to cope with the ills and ailments of our time. If one’s will to meaning is being satisfied then that human being becomes happy—only not by striving for happiness, but by pursuing meaning, because happiness only helps you as a side effect. Now, since a human being, whose will- to-meaning is being satisfied, also becomes happy, at the same time it is most interesting that he also becomes capable of suffering, of enduring tensions and frustrations, and eventually he is prepared to give his life.

Consider the various political resistance movements throughout the world and throughout history. If one’s will to meaning is being frustrated and remains unsatisfied, then one is inclined to take one’s life—and will do it in the midst of, and in spite of, affluence and welfare. What I want to convey to you is that people might have the means to live, but unless they also have a means to live for, they are threatened by depression and suicide.

Now, let us ask for a moment how it is that a psychology that is fascinated by the pattern of natural science, that such a psychology is ignoring these concepts such as meaning and purpose. I’ll try to show why this is happening.

The observation of any process immediately influences a process itself. Now, what about psychological processes? You see, the observing eye of the psychologist is fascinated by the natural science model. He observes the human being, and the human being is the subject–but the observation changes the person  into a mere object. Now, it is my personal theory that it is the essence of the subject that it has an object of its own. What do I mean by that? I just mean that the existential thinker sees the intentionality of man as an activity which focuses on something, or someone beyond himself. He sees the essence of the human being basically not concerned with anything within himself, but, on the contrary, he’s reaching beyond himself to meanings to fulfill, to other human beings to love. Now this intentionality, or this directiveness toward objects of its own, is benign, shut out, and excluded and cut off from the subject by its being made into an object. And what it finally does is that in the world in which a human being exists, and this is called being in the world, and this being with other people, rather than being concerned with homeostasis, satisfaction of drives, needs and, conditioning, etc., is being shut out.

Nevertheless, this would constitute the reasons of my act; I’m acting to a world rather than reacting to stimuli, rather than reacting to instincts and drives. The psychodynamic model depicts man abreacting to tensions. The behaviorist model depicts man as reacting to stimuli. But actually man is neither abreacting nor reacting, but is acting, and he is acting into a world of fellow human beings and of meaning, and this is shut out, so they have no reasons to act and behave. And what remains instead of the reasons are causes. Is there a difference between a reason for acting or a cause that propels me to act? There is a difference. If you cut onions, you start to cry. Your tears have a cause, but your tears have no reason. If you’re crying because your loved one has died, you would have a reason to cry. With onions it is just a cause for your tears. In other words, now that man has been made into an object there are no reasons out in the world, but only causes that call one to behave one way or the other. The causes have to be hypothesized in terms of drives, instincts, conditioning, and learning processes, so this is no longer a human being that you are doing psychology about. I hope I can make myself understood this way.

If we wish to re-humanize psychotherapy, we have to follow man into the human dimension, to become cognizant of his meaning orientation rather than his drive and instincts. Is this to say that we just dismiss science and scientific methodology? Not at all. We just have to overcome the one-sidedness.

Out of research has come the notion that meaning is available to each and every person, irrespective of his or her IQ, character structure, educationbal background, environment, etc. Even in the ghetto, meaning is available in principle, irrespective of whether one is religious or not. And if someone is religious, irrespective of the denomination to which he or she belongs, one can find meaning and principle under their religion.

More than that, we have wandered aimlessly when dealing with taboos. I came across a novel where I found the following sentence: “There is a subject nowadays which is taboo, in a way that sexuality was once taboo, which is to talk about life as if it had any meaning.” If you ask me how meaning can be found unconditionally, how it is possible that meaning can be found literally at one’s last breath, this is due to the fact that there are three avenues leading up to a meaningful life.

First, by doing the deeds created in your work, life can be made beautiful, not only in work but also in experiencing the beauty in your work and the world in general– the good in the world. Next, in experiencing not something, but someone— encountering another human being in his or her very uniqueness, which is the definition of love. Loving means experiencing another human being and becoming aware of the uniqueness of that other person.

So, we see work and love make life meaningful, but beyond that, the third avenue is that potential meaning can be found if we are caught as the helpless victims of a hopeless situation, facing an unchangeable fate. If we are caught or confronted with the fact that we are incurably ill, then there is the possibility that we bear witness to the uniquely human capacity to turn a personal predicament into a human achievement, to turn a tragedy into a triumph. And this is possible to the last breath, because even death offers an opportunity to bear witness to what a human being is capable of. It is not by coincidence that death is the final stage of growing. Even death allows for rising above one’s situation, thereby growing beyond one’s self. If we watch simple people or noble people, we may see how capable they are of turning tragedy into person triumphs, how they are capable of squeezing out meaning from the most miserable or most trivial situations.

 

Several years ago a garbage collector received the Order of Merit from the German government. This man did his job to everyone’s satisfaction, but the special effort that gave him the reward was this: He looked through the garbage for discarded toys, spent his evening hours to repair them, and gave them to poor children as presents. As a fix-it man, he added to his clean-up job a magnificent meaning.

Another man, a doctor, examined a Jewish woman who wore a bracelet. The doctor admired the bracelet, and she said the parts of the bracelet belonged to the nine children who had been killed in the Nazi gas chambers. Shocked, the doctor asked her how she could live with such a bracelet. Quietly, the Jewish woman replied, “You see, I am now in charge of an orphanage in Israel.” People are capable of squeezing out meanings of a most tragic situation. Situations that may not be able to be changed, but you can change yourself to rise above the situation and to grow beyond yourself.

There was a question that is asked: “So, do you believe that suffering is necessary in order to arrive at meaning?” My contention is that meaning is possible– in spite of suffering!

After watching the Holocaust, a Polish man involved in carrying out mass executions was asked for his reaction. He was the military organizer of the Warsaw upheaval.  He said that taking a gun and shooting someone was no  great thing. But if the SS leads you to a mass grave to execute you on the spot, or if the SS drives you to a gas chamber, and you cannot do anything about it except for keeping your head high and going your way with dignity, this is what I call a human achievement. The highest dignity goes to those who cannot do anything about their hopeless situation, but keep their heads high.

Essentially, life remains meaningful unconditionally. In other words, meaning is inexhaustible. But what is inexhaustible is energy. We live in an age of energy crises and shortages. We’re living in a post-petroleum society, as it were. Now, you see, I believe that the energy crisis is not only a threat, but offers a chance that the accent and impulses of people may shift from the means to live to a meaning to live for. This emphasis may be shifted from material goods to existential needs. Let me say that I regard the movement toward logotherapy really to be one of the human rights movements, because the focus is on the intrinsically and fundamental human rights to a life as meaningful as possible, and I think psychotherapy and counseling should do justice to this special human rights.

Now I will take questions.

QUESTION: Dr. Frankl, I’ve studied your theory of paradoxical intention and it seems that you are talking about lives reaching the point of spontaneity. Am I not mistaken that in your theory of paradoxical intention, that when you alleviate the pressure of fear or failure of a person going to sleep or sweating or stuttering, that you are really bringing that person to a point of spontaneity, and that in your logotherapy you are trying to give that person life and meaning so that he can become more spontaneous. Is that basically what you are saying?

ANSWER: Yes. What you’re saying is very interesting and a remarkable contribution to the interpretation of what really goes on in meaning-oriented logotherapy, and in that aspect of logotherapy, which deals on a more down-to-earth clinical level with phobias, obsessive compulsive neurosis, etc. My own interpretation is a bit different, but I am not the best and greatest master in practicing paradoxical intention. Other people do it much better.

QUESTION: The reason I ask you this is that I teach behavioral science to corporations, and I use your theory of paradoxical intention to eliminate the stress that executives and marketing people have been getting  to take the pressure off of fear and failure, quota systems, competitive systems, and to relate to your thirteen and fourteen year old suicidal people. I think they’re crying out for relief from the competitive system—the fear of failure—that they can’t compete, and so, consequently, they turn to drugs and suicide and what have you, and I use your theory in my work to help executives.

ANSWER: Paradoxical intention and logotherapy are moving in two direction. Paradoxical intention often remains in the psychological dimension. Many behaviors are successfully using and propagating paradoxical intention without caring for logotherapy, without caring for that dimension in which  the search for meaning exists. And I would say that there are many statistics to the effect that 90% of students attempting suicide did so because they couldn’t see meaning in their lives. I personally don’t think that suicide is due to the lack of meaning. It might be due to various reasons. When suicide attempts are not undertaken because of lack of meaning, it might well indicate that there were visions of a meaning to life of some sort, and this could have helped the respective individual to overcome the inclination to suicide. So, in such cases where people are depressed, one should not try to apply paradoxical intention to circumvent the fear of failure, but in the first place one might have to show and persuade the individual that there is also meaning to his life, and if he becomes cognizant of this, meaning he will be capable of tolerating some tensions and frustrations and not be so afraid of failure, because he would say in even cases of failure there is a lot of meaning and potential.

QUESTION: Aren’t you really saying that the person must be satisfied with himself before he can really obtain the potential of his achievements, because of the fact that he is a unique individual? Uniqueness in today’s schools is squashed. The talented, personable child is sitting in the principal’s office most of the time. Conformity is the rule. I think in order to change this we must change the values of what a child thinks success and failure are, because this is what he determines his behavior patterns by. Do you agree with this?

ANSWER: This, in a sense, I would subscribe to. But, you see, it is not is a matter of hierarchy of values, because what logotherapy is ultimately pleading for is the recognition that even the failure—or in spite of failure—meaning can be found. So people should not idealize, should not make success into an ultimate goal. They should not make success the peak of the hierarchy. This is the main misunderstanding—especially in America. People are pursuing happiness and success, but both should not be the peak of the hierarchy. Meaning, fulfillment and loving encounter are much more important, and on the contrary, striving for both success and happiness are elusive and self-defeating. If you will forgive my becoming a bit personal, I wrote a book within nine days in 1945 without my name printed on it. I wanted the book to be published anonymously, with the absolute determination and conviction that that way would not attribute anything to my reputation as a psychiatrist, but for the sake of telling people it is possible—even in the situation of Auswitz—not to doubt that life has meaning up to the last moment, and to persuade the people of that. In that book, and all our books together, this one book that I wrote within nine days with conviction was published, to become a great success. However, the less you care for success, the sooner success will come to you naturally, automatically. The less you care for your potency, in sexual pleasure and orgasm, the more you will have potency and you will have your orgasm. The more you are concerned with your potency, the more you are doomed to impotency. Love is the direction of our day-to-day practice, and you will be dismissed as a status seeker if you strive only for success. But if you let success and happiness come to you, then you’ll be much better off.

QUESTION: Would we be better off then if we didn’t teach our children success and failure as we know it today, and more that we should teach them spontaneity of their uniqueness and individuality, and let happiness be a bi-product of their spontaneity?

ANSWER: Success and happiness must remain a bi-product rather than being pursued. Let me add a warning: by spontaneity you are moving in the direction of identity and self-actualization, and if anyone should misinterpret your words let me say also that identity and self-actualization can be brought about by not caring for them. The more you love someone else the more you become happy and the more you’re actualizing yourself, and you’re finally arriving at your identity, but what is valid in no place more than in this context are the wonderful words of a German philosopher saying, “What a man is, is that he becomes  the cause which he has adopted to his own.

QUESTION: For every situation you speak of there being only one solution that is right, and we may not find that meaning, but that does not alleviate our responsibility to try to find the “one” meaning. This idea of one meaning doesn’t seem to fit into my notion or understanding of existentialism, whereby there is a situation where there is no solution and you give meaning to it yourself. If that is true then how can you find what would be the “one” meaning for each situation?

ANSWER : Potential meaning is dormant in children in a way comparable to a Gestalt figure. In a Gestalt figure you suddenly become aware of a figure against a background, but in a meaning-finding process you suddenly become aware of a possibility against the background of reality—namely the possibility to change reality. Now, if you’re confronted with this situation, there are alternatives, and if you go through all those alternatives you will find there is one solution to the problem. This cannot be done on rational terms. You have to rely on intuition and that organ, the brain, which is wired into the human being in ways that are usually referred to as our conscience. Conscience usually says to you—without having to think—what to do. There is just not subjective meaning here. There is a subjective meaningfulness available by drug usage, where suddenly everything becomes “meaningful.” But this is not true meaning. True meanings are objective, in as much as they have to be found and experienced, rather than being freely, arbitrarily attributed to the world or situations outside the person.

QUESTION: In reading your books over the years, and being very in touch with the issue of meaning, it confuses me that your theory seems to be so ethically neutral. You just touched on true meaning. Were not the guards in the camps where you were a prisioner, from their point of view, leading a meaningful life? I’d like to ask you what is the difference in a meaningful life and a good life. When I think of a meaningful life I think of Albert Switzer or Mother Teresa. I immediately assume that meaning is good, but if you’re suggesting that each of us needs to discover a meaning for ourselves without a moral context or some moral overview in which to value whether what I’m doing is meaningful and is good or wrong, then why not supply my own private meaning,  with my existential vacuum in danger of being filled possibly by a very lousy ethical attitude. Wasn’t Hitler’s demonic genius fulfilling the young Germans to a very meaningful life, as they understood it?

ANSWER: Each person in each situation offers different meaning. I’ve already intimated that it is our conscience that helps intuitively to get hold of or to grasp the meaning of the moment, in contrast to ultimate meaning or super-meaning. The conscience, in contrast to what is called a superego, might well be the result of a conditioning process. True conscience is a specifically human phenomenon, but, alas, it is also  too bound up to human frailty, limitations, incompleteness, and insufficiency. In other words, our conscience may err, and up to the last moment, up to our lying or our deathbeds, we’ll never know absolutely whether our conscience is right or not. This I regard as the principle assignment of education, not only to transmit knowledge and tradition, but also to refine our conscience so that we become able, under certain conditions, to find out our true meanings, even in tragic situations. And if you ask me an interesting sociological phenomenon, that no one has asked in Germany, but which I have been asked in America, “What would you have told Adolph Hitler if he came to your office and asked about the meaning of his life, and what should he do to obey his conscience?” Obviously, in this case of Hitler, I would have handed out the admonition that he obey his conscience, but to also carefully listen to it, because it is inconceivable to me that if Hitler had really listened to his conscience, he would never have become the monster that he was. And his conscience, in the final analysis, would have told him to try another way to re-establish that reputation of national Germany—not through a World War, genocide, etc. He would have arrived at another means. And that is the answer if you ask me such a difficult question and wish me immediately to come up with an over-simplified answer. This is also my answer to the problem of terrorism. The terrorists are living in an existential vacuum, and they try to find a mission in their lives. But if they will listen to their consciences they will become aware that there are two types of politics, two types of politicians. One  adheres to the principle that the goal justifies the means, while the other remains aware that there are means that desecrate even the most noble aim.

.

CONCLUSION OF LECTURE

.

ALCOHOL AND DRUG ADDICTION

The following article was written by a good friend and professional colleague of mine, Steve Parrett. Steve is a retired vocational rehabilitation counselor, who worked with alcohol and drug addicted clients for over thirty years. He was considered one of the best counselors among his peers, and his words put a slant on addiction that the public does not hear about in the general media. My hope is that anyone reading his article, who is struggling with addiction themselves, or is associated with a friend or loved one with this disorder, can put in proper perspective what needs to be done to  arrest this disease and begin to lead a normal life. It will also give assistance to professional caretakers who work with addicted clients.

 

VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND THE DISEASE OF ADDICTION

A Severe and Permanent Disability

By

Steve Parrett, M.Ed, M.Div.

 

The disease of addiction, including chemical dependency and other addictive disorders, definitely belongs in the category of permanent disabilities. Even when addiction is in a state of remission, it presents barriers to social and vocational functioning, because it is a chronic, progressive, potentially fatal disease, which can never be cured, although it can be controlled in the context of a lifelong recovery program that must be worked every day.

During the course of human development, the addictive individual has either never learned, or has lost touch, with the normal, appropriate ways to feel good about oneself: acceptance by and interaction with others (social), and a sense of personal achievement or accomplishment (primarily vocational for adults in our society). This brings about low self-esteem and creates a painful emptiness within the person. In order to fill this void and to feel better, the potential addict finds a vehicle that will instantly produce a change of mood that is pleasurable, intense, stimulating, exciting. Behaviors used to achieve these results are most often the use of alcohol and/other drugs, but could involve compulsive acting out of one or more pleasurable behaviors, such as eating, gambling, sex, spending money, or winning the approval of others. As the behavior is repeated, it becomes habitual and creates the illusion of control and direction in an otherwise fragmented life. Although the pleasure derived from the behavior decreases over time, the behavior is perpetuated to avoid pain (withdrawal) and to try desperately to recapture the familiar “ high.” At this point, the abuser has become an addict and has formed an intense emotional “relationship” with a chemical (mood-altering substance) or event (acting-out behavior).

As the abuse progresses to dependence and addiction, there occurs regression and deterioration in adult responsibility and functioning in all areas of life. As more and more time and energy is expended on and around the addictive behavior, the addict becomes increasingly isolated from other people and less capable of fulfilling responsibilities. There are definite functional limitations to employment. Using chemicals or acting out on the job causes impaired judgment and decreased work tolerance, resulting in sub-standard quality and/or quantity of work accomplished. An addict’s ability to concentrate and fulfill work duties can also be impaired by an obsessive/compulsive craving to feed the addiction and/or making plans to do so. Practicing the addiction off the job can cause excessive absenteeism from work due to several factors: related physical problems (including withdrawal), legal difficulties, impaired sense of timing and prioritizing, and a general loss of motivation to get to work due to an excessive pre-occupation with the addiction.

Addictive behavior becomes a habitual way of life and is continually repeated in spite of self-defeating and even self-destructive consequences. Addictive thinking replaces the logic of common sense as it becomes embedded in one’s personality structure. This delusional way of thinking includes persistent denial that this destructive process is taking place. Problems and consequences are explained away by blaming others and by a variety of creative excuses. On a deeper level, however, there is self-blame, guilt, and shame—painful feelings that can be relieved temporarily by more addictive behavior, which in turn causes more harmful consequences and pain, and so on in a vicious cycle. During this process, permanent and irreversible personality traits develop and grow, becoming more significant and basic to life itself than any specific addictive behavior. (This explains why addicts frequently add different types of substances or non-chemical addictive behavior to their life style and often switch from one prominent acting-out behavior to another). The key concept here is that eventually the addict forms a dependent relationship with his or her own addictive personality! At this point, the addict is powerless to change the behavior and will continue to deteriorate to total incapacitation or death, unless he or she in utter desperation relinquishes the illusion of control, admits that life has become unmanageable, and surrenders to outside help.

Recovery begins with becoming and learning to stay abstinent from addictive behavior, through medical treatment, counseling, addiction education, self-help groups, etc. However, a recovery program must go much further than abstinence. It is a process of learning (or re-learning) and practicing normal, healthy behaviors: first social (open and honest human interaction) and then productive/vocational (gradually assuming more independent adult responsibility). However, the addiction has made a permanent impact on the individual’s personality, creating tendencies to circumvent the difficult, often painful, recovery process by interacting with other people in more immediately gratifying, immature, controlling ways. Thus, the addict will likely use and manipulate others and exhibit impatience, inflexibility, impulsivity, and poor judgment. Self-esteem is still relatively low, so assertiveness, stress management, and decision-making skills are poor. In a job situation, these behaviors often result in dissension, disruption, and inefficient productivity, and can cause conflicts within co-workers, resistance to supervision, and decreased work tolerance. Obviously, termination from the job could result. Furthermore, the option to activate the original destructive, addictive behavior remains embedded in the core of the addict’s personality. On some level, the addict continues to believe that there is a mood-changing substance or behavior that can provide immediate nurturing, comfort, pleasure, and for a time help one to feel better and more adequate. The addictive behavior itself lies dormant during remission, but is always there potentially to be activated as a desperate coping mechanism in the face of a highly stressful situation. Because stressful situations can occur in life at any time, relapse is always a distinct possibility. And when a relapse of addictive behavior occurs, life again becomes impaired by the aforementioned limitations of active addiction.

One common highly stressful life situation that is especially pertinent to the vocational rehabilitation of an addict is the persistence of underemployment beyond early recovery. The nature and timing of productive responsibility is tricky and crucial in the addiction recovery process. Stress can cause relapse, and the kind of work that causes stress changes for some individuals as recovery progresses. For the first six months to a year (or longer in some cases) in recovery, an addict works to support his or her recovery program, not just economically, but also as an integral part of the therapeutic process itself. At this stage, employment brings one into the re-learning process of acquiring and handling more responsibility that is productive. The work should be on a relatively low stress, often menial job, while the individual is putting more energy into the basic recovery issues of acceptance, healthy dependency, trust, honesty, and intimacy with other people. However, after about a year in recovery (varying among individuals), increasing self-esteem, by way of more appropriate and challenging personal achievement, becomes a key issue. This usually means a shift into, or taking positive steps toward, satisfactory employment that is commensurate with one’s intelligence, interests, abilities, education, and previous experience. At this point, crucial to staying in recovery, are both stimulation during the hours spent productively, and the identification of a suitable “vocation” or “career” as an integral aspect of one’s self image.  Achieving this goal without the help of professional vocational rehabilitation assistance can be extremely difficult, if not impossible. This is due to the negative impact of the disease of addiction on the person’s physical and mental health, work history, work habits, finances, family and community support systems, and self-confinence to sell oneself as a valuable, productive worker and to earn the respect of both self and employer. The frustration, boredom, and poor self-image perpetuated by under-employment, can indeed create enough stress to bring about a relapse of the addictive behavior. Because such a relapse could easily render the individual incapable of working at any level, a recovering addict in such a life situation (as determined through appropriate counseling and evaluation) certainly has a vocational handicap, even while in recovery and after having been employed at some level for a length of time.

It is true that addicts can often benefit from some short-term assistance while in early recovery. However, when considering actual “vocational rehabilitation” in this disability group, it is crucial with many individuals (not all) to maintain a distinction between the temporary interim jobs of early recovery and the longer term vocation objective pertaining to the personal fulfillment of a rewarding occupation or career. The situation is analogous to that of a high school or college student who works part-time in summer jobs, but whose primary objective is formal learning—getting an education. In many cases the interim jobs have little or no similarity to longer term career goals. No one would deny this young person the benefit of an education because he or she can function on a lower level job, while the primary objective is to learn to live and cope in the world again without the crutch of the active process of the disease of addiction.

In fact, in most cases, working an interim job for several months should be a requirement for vocational services, because it demonstrates the responsibility and motivation to maintain a solid recovery program—a critical factor in assessing an addictive individual for feasibility for rehabilitation services. On the other side of the coin, the counselor should be very careful not to offer vocational (i.e. “career goal”) services too early in the client’s recovery. Doing so would “enable” the addiction and actually interfere with the recovery process. The addictive nature is to seize every opportunity to distract oneself from dealing with painful, basic recovery issues by diverting attention and energy to something he or she wants that seems less painful to pursue. A “rewarding career,” like a geographical change in residence, and many other distractions, can be pursued by the manipulative nature of the addict as a false “quick-cure,” with the rehabilitation counselor or other helpers being “set up” as manipulative enablers of the disease process. After the first year of recovery, the addict has usually grown to the stage where suitable vocational or career choice is a legitimate recovery issue, and in some cases is crucial to the maintenance and progression of the recovery process itself.

Therefore, in terms of eligibility, the rehabilitation counselor and other helpers should then be free to appropriately serve the addicted individual, as long as they are knowledgeable of and respect the nature and timing of the recovery process, and what services are appropriate to a particular stage of recovery.

THE END

(Steve Parrett and I worked with addicted clients for many years. We provided vocational rehabilitation counseling and other needed services as appropriate after our clients completed the initial phases of their recovery process. This initial period consisted of detox, outpatient treatment, 12-Step Program participation, halfway house residence, counseling, and whatever else the clients needed. Almost all were required to remain clean and sober for one year before any in-depth vocational testing and counseling was provided. The reason for this extended period of time is the fact that alcohol and drug abuse alters the brain is such a way that it does not return to normal for about a year. Most psychologists do not do personality or IQ testing until after about a year of sobriety, because they will otherwise get a false impression of the client and his or her abilities. Joe Wilkins)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”, JOE WILKINS, COPYRIGHT (c) 2015

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

ADDENDUM TO CHAPTER 15 IN JOE’S BOOK, “HOW TO RAISE SUCCESSFUL CHILDREN”  — Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

 

When I wrote the above book, I was not fully aware of the pervasiveness of the electronic media on all our lives. Since the early 1950’s my generation was initially aware of how television was interrupting the study habits of some of our school children, and how many of us had curtailed our reading habits in favor of getting our information and entertainment from television instead. However, in those days it was not  a major problem, and was in fact considered to be a blessing, freeing us from some degree of tediousness and boredom in those who suffered from humdrum lives.

However, in recent years there has been an explosion of electronic devices, beyond the simple television set: cell phones, video games, earphone players, laptops, i-pads, tablets, and numerous other instruments that are quickly becoming integral parts of our lives. In and of themselves, these devices are good for the advancement of civilization–if we use them properly. Communication is easier and faster. Research about particular topics has been greatly facilitated by the availability of the Internet. Commerce, advertising, and shopping can be conducted from home. The future of our technology seems so wonderful that some believe it will promote a world with little or no limits.

Some of these positive dreams will happen, but like with all technology there will be some prices to pay. This article is to up-date my readers with some cautionary considerations with which they may not be aware, and which are especially important for child-rearing parents to know.

In Chapters 4,5,and 6 of my book we discussed, respectively, Thinking, Emotional, and Behavioral/Social skill development in children. Many experts believe that the earliest years, ages 0 to 6, are the most important, setting the stage for the years leading to the teens and adulthood. Everyone is aware of the many trials of the teenage years, but after a few years of awkward growth and development, ending at about age eighteen or so, most people progress on into the adult world feeling they have most of what they need to pursue their life goals. About all else they think will be needed is education to prepare them for specific jobs or careers, usually at college, technical training, or on-the-job instruction.

However, recent neurological and psychological research has now demonstrated that what we used to believe about human growth and development was a book without an ending. There is now a final chapter being written, which we can tentatively title, “The Human Brain Does Not Stop Growing Until About Age 25, Or Thereabouts!” What is being discovered is that parts of the brain continue to grow, developing its unique wiring diagram of neuron connections until the mid-twenties. And the most affected part of the brain is the pre-frontal cortex, where most of our “higher civilization” skills are developed–skills such as rational thinking, socialization, complex abstract reasoning, and other neurological growths that go to produce competent, productive adults.

So what, one may ask, does all this have to do with modern media devices? The crux of the situation is this: the development of certain critical  parts of the brain require extensive face-to-face communication and socialization among children, from birth until the mid twenties. The brain is not finished growing as soon as the child graduates from high school–or college! And the pervasive use of cell phones, i-pads, computers, and other electronic media by developing children and young adults, inhibits the development of those parts of the brain necessary to becoming a complete person!

One may legitimately ask how does being overly involved in the use of  electronic media inhibit the brain from developing to its maximum? It’s a complicated process, but avoiding direct communication with others limits face-to-face interaction, obscures the ability to observe body language, pick up subtle inflections in family and social situations, and other sophisticated nuances that families, tribes, schools, communities, and countries require of our citizens.

Almost all electronic involvement  on computers, the internet, electronic games, e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, cellphones, and telephones, in varying degrees, limits the total impact of the communication from one person to another. Can one imagine the messages that a young man and woman would get should the beau propose marriage to his girl over some electronic media, versus doing it in person while holding her hand! Absent would be the smell of her perfume, the cadence of their breathing, the look in both their eyes, the surrounding sounds, the anticipatory expectations, and all the other subtle nuances of the event. And all  the stimuli arising from a personal, face-to-face marriage proposal would have a radically different impact on both their developing brains, versus a proposal made over some electronic media!  And it is the presence of critical, personal stimuli which causes new brain connections to form, many stimuli which would be absent over a cell phone or Twitter.

Back when this counselor was working with mentally ill patients, several professional colleagues in private practice told me how they were doing more “phone counseling and therapy.” Initially, I didn’t know what to make of this, because all my training and experience consisted of dealing with clients face-to-face, either individually or in groups. Phone conversations were to set appointments for direct meetings or other minor issues. Soon, professional journal articles began to appear as to the benefits of this “phone counseling.” I never accepted it, because I always valued all the information I could get by directly observing the client’s body language: pupils in their eyes getting wider or narrower, wringing of hands, perspiring, blushing or blanching, arms defensively crossing, leaning forward or backward, shuffling of feet, smiling or frowning–all non- verbal information important to the situation and permanently being inscribed on their brains in their intellectual and emotional systems. None of this would have been available to me or them over a phone or on Facebook.

Therapy consists of helping clients develop “corrective” programs in their thinking, feeling, and behaving brains, trying to overcome and replace “bad” programs that they learned in earlier years–or never were taught in the first place! Now, imagine a child brought up on a steady diet of electronic media communication–to the neglect of interpersonal, intimate interaction with others. Such a child arriving at post-age 25 adulthood would be quite sophisticated in the electronic media world, but would be less capable in other important areas of life. Imagine a person whose spelling lessons were from Twitter only, or whose math ability always required the use of a computer!

The Dana Foundation, an organization advancing brain research, found that the human brain continues to develop its “wiring” diagram well into the mid twenties. The most affected areas of the brain are the frontal lobes, which are critical to the development of high level cognitive skills, such as judgement, intellectual capabilities, and the regulation of emotions. And a Kaiser Foundation study noted that high school students spent about 6.5 hours per day on their computers, supposedly studying, but actually two-thirds of that time was spent on other things, such as playing games, cruising the internet, etc. These students became very good at multi-tasking, but became superficial in many important behavioral skills, and the learning quality was not good. They were spending too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends electronically.

A review of several studies indicates the following results in people who have spent too much time with electronic media:

  1. There is depersonalization (lack of empathy) from limited direct contact with people. They often don’t have a good sense of what society’s normal behavior is.
  2. They communicate more often– but the quality of their communication is weaker.
  3. Kids who spend too much time in front of a media screen, communicating with their friends, rather than being with them personally, are less likely to understand emotions, don’t create strong relationships, and tend to become more dependent on others.
  4. Because kids need to be hugged and touched a lot instead of being texted, their overuse of technology directly affects their brain development.
  5. The more children interact with others through electronic media, rather than in person, their emotions are connected to the media exchange itself, resulting in a deficit in intimacy need fulfillment.
  6. Social media communication makes it easy to “hide”, while still appearing to be okay.
  7. Cellphone usage while driving is like driving drunk
  8. Technology and screen time rewires brains in certain patterns that can inhibit the development of brain neurological circuits that control more traditional learning, such as reading, writing and arithmetic skills. Any attention deficit disorder causes here?
  9. In a 2011 study girls sent about 4000 texts per month, while boys sent around 2800. It doesn’t take much speculation to imagine what that is doing to their developing brains. Not being in substantial, direct contact with others during childhood, rather than being with them personally, makes people less likely to understand emotions, less able to create strong relationships, and tending  to become more dependent on others.

 

Summing all this up shows that parents need to use good sense in allowing their children in the use of all these modern media devices. Obviously there are benefits to learning their use, however, it is abundantly clear that nothing should interfere with also exposing them to an abundance of social interactions;  reading books, magazines, newspapers, and other printed materials where proper English is used; exposure to stimulating conversations face to face; and developing the other skills outlined in this book.

All new inventions and technical advances promote the growth of the human race in many ways. Yet, there is always a downside, or unintended consequences, to these advances. If we were all robots there would be few problems, but the hard reality is we all possess a brain that has been pretty much the same for thousands of years. And this brain, while capable of marvelous things when properly programmed, still requires a lot of good, old-fashioned learning. Make sure your children get it all.

 

( If you like this article, the book to which this article is an addition is available on amazon.com. The reviews have been very favorable. Check them out. You won’t find a book like this one.)

 

TAG YOUR BOOTS

TAG YOUR BOOTS

By

Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015

(This essay will prove uncomfortable to some readers. I wish it were not so, but hard reality is often that way.  Contained herein is a point of view formed over a long counseling career, working with, and trying to help some of the most dysfunctional people in our society. I am demonstrating one system than can be helpful in dealing with unwanted, deviant behavior in our society. It is not the only way to approach the problem, but I contend it is the simplest, most effective way. These ideas are incorporated in Chapter 7, “Tough Love,” of my book How To Raise Successful Children, which is available on Amazon.com.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Many people today are wondering what is wrong with America? They see crime rising, illegitimate births increasing, illegal immigrants flooding across our borders, a criminal justice system that is more responsive to criminals than to the victims, illegal drugs readily available on many street corners, health care costs rising astronomically, unemployment and poverty increasing, and the national debt skyrocketing. In fact, the problems are so numerous that it is becoming almost impossible to feel what is right with America. And this is causing a low-grade pessimism among the people that is settling over our country like a smothering fog. Most of us do not like it, but we don’t know what, or how, to change it.

Well, there are some things we can do, as illustrated by the following true story.

The United States Marine Corps sends all new recruits to Paris Island, South Carolina for basic training—or for physical and attitude adjustment training, as an ex-Marine friend of mine puts it. These recruits come from all over the country, from all lifestyles, different races, educational levels, and social backgrounds—about as diverse a group one could find. In addition, these men present a special problem to the Marine Corps: in just twelve weeks, the Corps has to get all these different personalities thinking and working alike, with there being little room for individualism. The realities of combat demand they work together as disciplined units, ready to defend our country on a moment’s notice should the need arise.

Seems like an impossible task, doesn’t it? Especially in view of the fact that many other organizations, which have the need to get people working toward society’s goals, are unable to do so. Consider families that can’t get their children to behave; parole boards that are unable to get newly released prisoners to obey the laws; welfare agencies that can’t get people to quit having babies they can’t take care of; treatment facilities that can’t make alcoholics and drug addicts stay clean and sober; abused women who can’t get their husbands to stop beating them. The list is endless, and you could doubtless add many of you own examples.

Nevertheless, I contend there is a way to control such behaviors, if we can only muster up the gumption to take the appropriate actions. And the Marine Corps can show us a productive way.

The year was 1967 and the war in Viet Nam was cooking. The Marines needed new men in large numbers—fast! For one particular platoon it was the tenth week of their basic training, with only two weeks to go. The men were doing well, looking forward to graduation and becoming full-fledged marines.

“Everyone fall out tomorrow for a twenty-mile, forced march,” announced their drill instructor. “I want full field packs—with helmets, double ammo, full canteens–and take an extra pair of boots. Don’t leave anything behind because you’re going to need all your gear. I want you fully outfitted and prepared for anything that might come up.”

The next morning off they marched, each man loaded down with over fifty pounds of gear, headed for Ellis Beach, ten miles away. Finally, after marching, hot and tired, they arrived at the beach, with their feet hurting, and their packs now seeming to weigh hundreds of pounds. They had been resting just a few moments when a truck rumbled up alongside the platoon.

“Okay,” the drill instructor barked out, “rest a minute, drink some water, then take off your boots, tie them together with these tags I’m handing out. Put your last name and serial number on the tags and throw your boots on the truck. Then get out your spare boots and put ‘em on. We’ll be marching back in five minutes.”

Immediately the men hustled to comply with his orders—except for one man. That lone, non-compliant recruit just stood there, looking despondent and hopeless. The drill instructor noticed him soon, and bellowed in his face, “What’s wrong, Marine? Didn’t you hear me? Tag those boots!”

“But, sir—I—I can’t,” he blurted out in desperation.

“And why not?” challenged the drill instructor.

“Because I didn’t bring my extra boots.”

“Well, that’s just too bad. Off with those boots—now!”

The recruit was desperate now. “But, sir, he implored, “I’ll have to march back barefooted.”

The drill instructor was losing patience. “Tag those boots!” he screamed.

The recruit immediately sat down and hurriedly took off his boots. He looked around at the others, but realized there would be no sympathy from them. There was disdain and condemnation in their faces.

Then the platoon began the march back. They hiked through scrub and briars, palmettos and sandspurs, hot asphalt and concrete. The drill instructor intentionally made the trip back more difficult, causing the barefooted recruit all the pain imaginable. After a while, the recruit could take no more, and dropped out of formation by the side of the road, while the others marched on. He was then ordered into the truck and taken straight to the brig, where he “cooled his heels” for several days, wondering nervously what was going to happen to him. However, after the drill instructor figured he had “learned his lesson,” he rejoined his platoon. He was a model marine from then on.

The recruit had learned his lesson well—and fast. Very few words were exchanged. No attempts were made to find out why he had left his boots behind. He was not referred to a counselor to determine the source of his rebellion and passive-aggressive anger toward the Marine Corps. No attempt was made to reason with him. There was no getting the other men involved, other than they had only viewed his behavior, and how he was dealt with. This was a simple case of, “If you don’t do as I say, then something bad will happen to you!” Tag your boots!

Now some readers may think the drill instructor was too harsh, that the punishment was cruel and unusual. However, others may think he should have been made to march the whole way back, and, doubtless, some drill instructors may have done just that. But the bottom line is the technique worked. The Marines Corps reinforced its authority, the recruit learned a valuable lesson, the platoon progressed forward, and everyone graduated from basic training as full-fledged marines. One could wonder what kind of marines they would have become if the wayward recruit had gotten away with his scheme and was not punished. I contend the platoon would not have been as dedicated and efficient. Thus, the punishment was appropriate.

With this incident, we see illustrated a principle that is the whole point of this essay: if we want to prevent people from committing certain objectionable behaviors, then we must follow their misdeeds   with consequences they do not want to happen. However, this punishment must be used selectively and in an appropriate manner. It’s clear that “tagging your boots” is one form of punishment, and punishment is looked upon as anathema by many in our society. Some even view punishment as evil, and should be avoided at all costs. A few years ago, a young man in Singapore broke one of their laws, and was sentenced to be whipped with canes, causing a tremendous uproar around the world—especially with a huge portion of American society, incensed that Singapore would have the audacity to punish a lawbreaker in such a manner.

Since punishment is looked upon by many as one might view a rattlesnake, the science of psychology might allay those feelings somewhat. Scientific studies have repeatedly shown that learned responses of avoidance and fear have a strong impact on our personality development when we are young. Punishment is essential to the development of these inhibitory emotions, which help control inappropriate behaviors that do not serve the individual and the community well. People with no fear and guilt can be dangerous, because they have no internal “inhibitors” that prevent them from committing certain deeds. Conversely, people with a healthy set of fear and guilt feelings are not likely to break many of society’s rules or laws, because these are feelings people tend to avoid, thus the behavior causing them rarely occurs. Misdeeds committed by those who don’t feel guilty—because they weren’t punished as children in a responsible, loving manner—will be repeated over and over.

Other research shows that, with young boys, it is more important that the father administer such discipline rather than the mother. A mother simply has less power to instill appropriate fear and guilt in a son than does the father—although the mother does have some influence. However, as young boys mature, the social-identity process impels them toward males as role models, and a good father is the best model.

This speaks to a disturbing trend currently in our society, whereby we condone and reward single motherhood, producing legions of young men who do not know how to behave as responsible males, because they adopt males outside their families as role models, males who do not always have their best interests at heart. An adolescent male, loaded with testosterone and aggressive hormones, who has not been taught by significant males the proper roles of guilt, shame, and fear, is trouble on the rise. This capacity for fear and guilt is the end product of a sequence of child-rearing activities, using love-oriented punishment, leading to strong identification with the same sex parent. To put it more simply, the best drill instructors for young men in boot camp are males.

One study showed that many anti-social boys tend to come from those homes where the parents were cold, distant, or absent—not from homes that disciplined and punished with love. Sparing the loving rod of discipline tends to produce incomplete children.

Social psychology clearly shows us the complexity of reward and punishment on the development of children’s moral codes and inhibitions, with their willingness to follow society’s rules. Most criminals are people who have not been taught when they were young how to behave properly. However, parents are not totally to blame here: the schools, TV, literature, peers, gangs, and other aspects of our society share in the upbringing of our children, and often teach and reinforce many negative attitudes and behavior. If one accepts the premise that the total society is to blame for criminal behavior, we are then left with a huge, apparently unsolvable dilemma: that, in a free republic, we can’t seem to unite sufficiently to control all these dysfunctional “teachers” of our children to prevent the production of criminals. So, we throw up our hands in despair and do little to solve the problem.

However, complaining is but a temporary catharsis, engaged in by politicians, the media, and citizens of rhetoric. Sensible people know that once our wayward children reach adulthood, as a practical matter, it’s too late to teach them those lessons they needed to learn as children. The horse is already out of the barn, so to speak.

Thus, with the adult criminal we are left with only one option: we have to do whatever is necessary to prevent people from committing crimes. We can’t go inside the heads of such people and change dysfunctional attitudes at this late date—something that is only occassionaly possible using psychotherapeutic techniques, which are slow and prohibitively expensive, and rarely work. (That old joke applies very well here: How many counselors does it take to change a light bulb? A lot, but the bulb has to really want to change.) Thus for people who  continuously break laws, if they have no internal roadmap of fear or guilt to stop them, then we as a society must give them some sort of external fear that will stop them. We have to use the threat of punishment to stop their misdeeds. It’s our primary option. Tag your boots!

In alcohol and drug treatment there is a rule that says that once someone becomes physically addicted, they will never be able to safely drink or use drugs again without suffering serious—and often fatal—consequences. Only when the addict arrives at the point where this reality is true for him or her, is there an improved chance for sobriety. If the addict realizes that continued use of alcohol or drugs will cause that person to die or go crazy, there will then be an improved chance for sobriety. The chemical that the addict used to love and cherish so much, becomes the punisher. Tag your boots!

Next, consider the drug smuggler. Anyone with the proper know-how can fly to south America, buy some cocaine, re-enter the United States, sell the cocaine, and make a huge profit, with very little chance of getting caught. This behavior is going on all the time, as many of my former clients related to me in detail. And these smugglers are killing and ruining more lives than can be imagined—costing our society an enormous price. But the drug dealers do not care, and they feel no guilt or fear. Their motivation is greed, with no concern about the human destruction they are causing. There is no little voice inside them saying, “Don’t do that! It’s wrong!” They do it anyway.

The question has become, how do we stop them? Over the years, we have tried many things that do not work: rehabilitation programs, weak prison terms, confiscation of ill-gotten property, increasing public awareness, and patrolling the nation’s point of entries. And each year the smuggling and drug abuse increases, while the public demands more drugs.

But there’s one thing we haven’t done; we have not made these smugglers and dealers tag their boots. How can we do this? Pass and implement laws that say, “If you smuggle drugs into this country, or sell drugs, we’ll catch you, and when we do you will be quickly prosecuted–and executed.” Then the public can sit back and watch the drug trafficking grind to a halt. Tag your boots.

Next, consider illegal immigration. This problem is now out of control, and the Congress and the President hasn’t the knowledge or will to fix it. Some people abroad have the notion that America is the solution to the world’s problems, with the effect that many people in less fortunate parts of the world want to come to America to improve their lives—and there are many Americans willing to let them come, legal or not. Thus, each day thousands of illegal immigrants slip across our borders. If we continue to allow this, it can bankrupt our social-welfare, educational, and work-related systems. With the world’s population projected to double within the next fifty years, the conditions pushing this illegal immigration trend will only increase, thus the problem is not going away.

To get a true fix on the current immigration situation, look at it from an illegal immigrant’s perspective. Here he is living in Mexico or Central America, living in squalor, with no job, no hope for the future, too many children, and a poor societal support system. His children will have a worse life than him, because the future is grim.  The population is exploding out of control, resources are dwindling, and the political leaders are helpless to turn things around. It is evident that everyone will have to do with less. However, he has learned that in America, there exists everything he wants and needs. So, one night he slips across the border—and it doesn’t matter if the border patrol sees him or not, because he knows they are under orders not to use force. Eventually he will get a job from someone who is desperate for cheap labor, who will pay him with cash that will not be reported to the government. And even if he is caught, they will simply load him onto an air-conditioned bus and drive him back across the border, where he will keep trying to cross again. He can’t lose. And once he finally gets settled in America, he can manipulate the system, get some welfare benefits and food stamps, make arrangements to get his family across, and send his children to the wonderful, free schools. What a country!

But one thing bothers him; he heard one border guard being interviewed on the radio, saying that thousands of illegal immigrants cross the border each day, and he is powerless to stop them, because he has been forbidden to use force. All he can do is holler on the bullhorn and tell them to go back home—which they never do because there is no punishment for crossing the border. Then the guard says that if he were allowed to shoot just one immigrant—after fair warning—the immigrant flow would stop. It is certain that if prospective illegal immigrants knew they would be shot if they attempted the crossing, they wouldn’t try it. And if no one tried it, no one would be shot. But there is no boot- tagging in the US Immigration Service.

Already some  readers of this essay are squirming and shifting in their chairs. They think this is too extreme—shooting illegal immigrants! What would the carnage be like? Moreover, how do you shoot just one illegal immigrant. America is constitutionally incapable of doing this, given the current state of the American psyche. However, there would be less carnage with boot-tagging than without it, and I am sure we could develop other boot-tagging options to replace the shooting of immigrants.  With swift, sure consequences hanging over their heads, most people will quit doing those things they shouldn’t. And those few who continue their bad ways—and are dealt with severely—wouldn’t get much sympathy from most Americans. We will save that for the victims.

A woman friend of mine married a man from Iran, with whom she had three sons. Occasionally they would go back to Iran to visit his relatives. One day she absent-mindedly left her purse, with considerable cash in it, on a store counter for several hours after leaving. When she realized what she had done, she rushed back to the store to retrieve it—and it was still in the same place where she had left it. All her cash and possessions were still within; no one had touched or disturbed it. She said that was not unusual in Iran because there is little thievery. Why? Because in Iran, convicted thieves are punished by having a hand cut off! And she said she didn’t see anyone with missing hands. She concluded that thievery had been abolished in Iran. Tag your boots!

Consider the traffic light. Did you ever notice that everyone stops for the red light: rich, poor, crooks, the mentally ill, drunks, rapists, murderers, middle-class, lower-class, high-class—virtually every- one in societies around the world. You name the group and they all stop for red lights. Why do they obey this rule, yet disregard others that we value, which are just as important? It is because the consequence of going through a red light is a boot-tagging situation, whereby the offender stands a high probability of being smashed into by another vehicle.

A counselor friend of mine tells the story about a relative of his in rural Alabama, who had a husband who was “bad to drink,” as they called drunkenness in that area. For years this alcoholic’s main form of recreation was to get roaring drunk several times a month, then come home and beat  up and terrorize his wife and children. His wife had endured this for years because she had been taught by her parents and her church to be subservient and obedient to her husband.

But the day came when her tolerance was exhausted; she could endure it no more. One day he came home drunk again, and began calling her derogatory names–then began hitting her. That did it!

For all those years, she had endured his abuse—but no more! This was it—her pot was boiling over! This enraged woman, suddenly energized to the strength of Wonder Woman by her years of pent-up anger, knocked her staggering husband to the floor with a mighty blow with her fist. Then she jumped on top of him, grabbed him by both ears and began beating his head on the floor, screaming, “You drunken bastard, you no-good-son-of-a-bitch, you lousy excuse of a man. I’m going to kill you!” She beat his head on the floor until he stopped moving, believing she had killed him, until she noticed he was still breathing. He was unconscious.

The next morning he got up from the floor, hung-over, battered, and sick—and puzzled. He remembered nothing of what had happened, having been in an apparent alcoholic blackout. All he knew was that he was hurting and sick. “What happened?” he moaned to his wife. “Feels like a truck ran over me. And my ears hurt real bad!”

His wife looked at him long and hard, the fires of anger still raging in her. “A truck did run over you, and that truck was me. And I ain’t putting up with no more of your drunken ways. I beat you last night ‘til I thought you were dead. And if you ever walk back in this house drunk again, I’ll make sure you’re dead the next time.”

He knew she meant it, because she never said things she didn’t mean. He figured that she would kill him—probably shoot him next time. So, he never drank again. Their marriage survived and they both lived into old age. Tag your boots.

As the next illustration of this principle, consider the law of gravity. As we all know, gravity is a universal constant (Just ask Sir Isaac Newton!)—a force that applies around the world. It does not discriminate, and acts equally on each of us regardless of age, sex, race, religious persuasion, or socio-economic status. No matter who you are, gravity will treat all persons equally. There is no discrimination here for malcontents to whine about. We can jokingly note that there has never been a single case in history where the law of gravity showed any favoritism. All people who journey to the top of the Empire State Building, for instance, and jump off, will be treated equally by gravity. No ifs or buts, if you jump you will be a terrific smash on the street below.

Now consider those times when the reader has been on high places and wondered what it would be like to jump off and soar like a bird. Wouldn’t that be thrilling, we think. Most people have had that experience—especially as children when we’re still exploring our world. We can almost experience the thrill of the free fall. Ah, the trip down would be exhilarating—to which all parachutists and bungee jumpers can testify. But we don’t jump. Why? Because we all know the law of gravity will lead to that fatal stop at the end. Tag your boots.

Several thousand years ago, one of the world’s great spiritual leaders, Moses, saw that his people needed some stricter rules to live by, so he went up on a mountain and came back with God’s Ten Commandments. Much like the Marine drill instructor, there were certain rules that God required of his people. But, alas, most people don’t follow them very well, instead treating them more or less like the Ten Suggestions. We no longer seem to require ourselves and others to obey them. Thus, we’ve lost these ancient tag-your-boots rules.

This leads us to an area that needs consideration: namely those roadblocks, currently emphasized in America, that inhibit us from effectively using punishment as a behavioral control for unwanted deviant behavior. One of the primary roadblocks in these times seems to be the confusing matter of rehabilitation vs. punishment. It has gotten to the point that the dream of rehabilitation has insisted that punishment is old school and is no longer needed. Thus, our laws and legal systems have progressed to the point that capital punishment is cruel and unusual. Reasons abound for this stance: he is a sinner, but deserves our forgiveness; Jesus would forgive him, so who are we not to do so; two wrongs don’t make a right; vengeance is mine, says the Lord; criminal behavior is a symptom of mental illness, so he must be treated rather than punished; punishment doesn’t work, only makes the person angrier; etc.

Many reasons are given not to take harsh action against criminals. The problem with this orientation is that it focuses on the criminal, to the neglect of the victim. However, if a person is murdered, then that life is gone forever, and nothing can be done to bring it back. That leaves us with only the perpetrator left to deal with, and it seems we do not have the stomach to apply appropriate punishment. In fact, we seem to no longer be able to determine just what is appropriate punishment for the different crimes.

It is implied by some religions and belief systems that a murdered victim is okay because he is now in the arms of God, gone to Nirvana, is in the spiritual realm of the next world, is one with the Force—whatever. Well, if any of these theories or beliefs is true—and it is so good for the believer—then logically it must also be good for the non-believer. Under this scenario, even the non-believers will experience the realities of the afterlife—though we would hope they would receive some sort of punishment for their earthly misdeeds.

However, if there is no afterlife—and no one can prove it exists—then no one gets any justice when a murderer is rehabilitated, yet the victim is dead and gone forever, missing out on the remaining time of life, while the murderer continues on. Where is the justice in that? The reality of all this is that we have taken the notion of rehabilitation so far that we no longer punish. We have become so tolerant and “forgiving” that we will now endure the most horrible of atrocities, and do little or nothing about them.

It would seem logical that we should punish all criminals after they commit their crimes, then if they accept their punishment in the correct spirit, with a truly remorseful attitude, by paying appropriate restitution to their victims, at that point we will then consider rehabilitation. To illustrate, I was recently leading a group-counseling session of criminals, all of whom were on probation or parole. They were feverishly discussing some recent changes in the ways prisoners were now going to be treated while incarcerated in Georgia. Their biggest concern was a very selfish one, in that some rehabilitation opportunities and privileges were being curtailed or stopped, and they didn’t think that was fair. They said that removing weight-lifting equipment, limiting TV watching, and decreasing educational opportunities was going to make prisoners angrier and would cause more trouble. At no time was there any concern for the victims of their crimes. When I brought up the notion that prison was a place for punishment for crimes, and that punishment ought to come first, they launched into all kinds of rationalizations, that rehabilitation was the only way to prevent future crimes. They had little understanding of the role of punishment in their lives, and I deduced that they had experienced little appropriately applied punishment for misdeeds when they were young. To them prison was a resting spot on the difficult journey of life—but certainly not a well-timed punishment.

A second roadblock is the principle to love one’s neighbor as yourself, or, turn the other cheek. Philosophically this is a cryptic message, especially to an angry person who has been wronged. It is true that if a man kills my brother, and I allow myself to become possessed with anger and a desire for revenge, then it will hurt me psychologically. Feelings of hate hurt the one who hates, but it is almost impossible to let go of hate without justice. Since most religions and civil laws do not allow citizens to take justice into their own hands, then it is the responsibility of the State to secure justice for the people by administering the appropriate punishment to law-breakers. Simply following one’s religious dictates is not enough.  Balancing the scales of justice requires that the church and State each administer their prescribed roles, with the punishment of criminals being the province of the State—with forgiveness (as they are being punished) being the responsibility of the victim’s religious beliefs.

It will be noted, for Christians, that Jesus, before and during his crucifixion, never said that the Romans did not have the authority to kill him, nor did he excuse the two thieves crucified along with him by condemning the Romans’ legal authority Thus, it is clear that Jesus recognized Rome’s authority to punish (Render unto Caesar that which is Caesars). So it would seem that we’ve boiled it down to justice versus love, and that seems to be the sticking point in many people’s minds. And since these concepts appear to be mutually exclusive, most people jump on one side or the other, while berating the opposite side for being so stupid or unfeeling.

To resolve this dilemma ask yourself this question: Am I showing my love if I allow you to break the laws and do nothing to punish you? The following is what is meant by the principle of loving your neighbor as yourself: Mr. Lawbreaker, society cares about you and respects you as a person, and we want you to have as much individual freedom as possible to pursue your own happiness, but if your pursuit conflicts with your neighbor’s rights, then our legal authorities have the right and duty to punish you appropriately, and we will take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that you don’t detract from your neighbors rights. If done properly, this will re-establish your relationship with your neighbor. That is the obligation of the society at large. Whether you get forgiveness and love as a neighbor from me is my burden under my relationship with God.

This religious philosophizing is well and good, and we can take whatever position we like, but our country is not a theocracy; it’s a republic run by secular laws, representing Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, atheists, heathens, Satanists, or any other religion one chooses to follow. So. In practice, our nation of laws is the product of the thinking of our Founding Fathers, following a variety of beliefs, sometimes with those beliefs suspended, in order that compromises can be reached to enact laws necessary for us to function in this non-spiritual world. Jesus recognized that these differences are not easily bridged, especially when he talked about rendering unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s, and unto God that which is God’s. This is a critical distinction that we conveniently keep ignoring, but these two worlds are different, and there will always be a wall between them.

Though this secular world is separate from the spiritual one, we nonetheless need to keep them in harmony with each other. Things need to be kept moral and on course. We do not need immoral laws, but we cannot allow religions to impose theological beliefs that conflict with our constitutionally-based laws. Without this congruence our society will eventually dissolve. Religion does not have all the answers needed to effectively deal with the practical, material world, which is the reason we have a secular government as opposed to a theocracy. In this world, the majority of our efforts are spent dealing with matter, information, facts and people–hopefully guided by logic, reason, science, laws and religion. Until we discover better ways to inhibit and prevent negative behavior from our misbehaving brothers and sisters, we must make them tag their boots.

There are endless examples of not tagging our boots, such as parents who don’t set limits with their children, resulting in the kids subsequently walking all over them; welfare agencies that dole out benefits without adequate requirements or consequences; a judicial system that emphasizes rehabilitation over punishment, and gives psychobabble excuses to criminal  behavior; speed limits on our highways that are rarely enforced, and to which no one pays attention; pampered athletes for whom a contract is always something to be renegotiated without fulfilling the original terms, with owners letting them get away with it, and then complaining about the selfishness of the players; politicians who never say what they mean, but always looking good when lying, with the electorate voting them back into office anyway, and then complaining how crooked they are; tobacco company executives who, in spite of all the scientific evidence to the contrary, and a half million deaths per year, continued to lie about the dangers of smoking, yet most of us do nothing and continue to use their products; and millions of couples taking marriage vows before God, the law, and their friends about loving and honoring each other their entire lives, yet divorcing at the slightest provocations—with the children suffering for it. The list is endless.

So, where do we go from here? As you may have already guessed, it is too late to administer loving, child-rearing discipline after the child is grown. Therefore, we have a sizable number of spoiled, undisciplined, whining, lawbreaking people who are causing this society enormous problems. With them, it is too late  to instill the control mechanisms of guilt and fear, which would impel them to obey our laws. However, while punishment will not change their psyches, it will quickly and surely stop certain behaviors in most cases. In a perfect world, we’d like to raise all our children to become model citizens of their own volition, but that is rarely possible. So we have no choice but to make them tag their boots.

 

THE END

 

 

 

 

 

 

TAG YOUR BOOTS
By
Joe Wilkins, Copyright © 2015
(This essay will prove uncomfortable to some readers. I wish it were not so, but hard reality is often that way. Contained herein is a point of view formed over a long counseling career, working with, and trying to help some of the most dysfunctional people in our society. I am demonstrating one system than can be helpful in dealing with unwanted, deviant behavior in our society. It is not the only way to approach the problem, but I contend it is the simplest, most effective way. These ideas are incorporated in Chapter 7, “Tough Love,” of my book How To Raise Successful Children, which is available on Amazon.com.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Many people today are wondering what is wrong with America? They see crime rising, illegitimate births increasing, illegal immigrants flooding across our borders, a criminal justice system that is more responsive to criminals than to the victims, illegal drugs readily available on many street corners, health care costs rising astronomically, unemployment and poverty increasing, and the national debt skyrocketing. In fact, the problems are so numerous that it is becoming almost impossible to feel what is right with America. And this is causing a low-grade pessimism among the people that is settling over our country like a smothering fog. Most of us do not like it, but we don’t know what, or how, to change it.
Well, there are some things we can do, as illustrated by the following true story.
The United States Marine Corps sends all new recruits to Paris Island, South Carolina for basic training—or for physical and attitude adjustment training, as an ex-Marine friend of mine puts it. These recruits come from all over the country, from all lifestyles, different races, educational levels, and social backgrounds—about as diverse a group one could find. In addition, these men present a special problem to the Marine Corps: in just twelve weeks, the Corps has to get all these different personalities thinking and working alike, with there being little room for individualism. The realities of combat demand they work together as disciplined units, ready to defend our country on a moment’s notice should the need arise.
Seems like an impossible task, doesn’t it? Especially in view of the fact that many other organizations, which have the need to get people working toward society’s goals, are unable to do so. Consider families that can’t get their children to behave; parole boards that are unable to get newly released prisoners to obey the laws; welfare agencies that can’t get people to quit having babies they can’t take care of; treatment facilities that can’t make alcoholics and drug addicts stay clean and sober; abused women who can’t get their husbands to stop beating them. The list is endless, and you could doubtless add many of you own examples.
Nevertheless, I contend there is a way to control such behaviors, if we can only muster up the gumption to take the appropriate actions. And the Marine Corps can show us a productive way.
The year was 1967 and the war in Viet Nam was cooking. The Marines needed new men in large numbers—fast! For one particular platoon it was the tenth week of their basic training, with only two weeks to go. The men were doing well, looking forward to graduation and becoming full-fledged marines.
“Everyone fall out tomorrow for a twenty-mile, forced march,” announced their drill instructor. “I want full field packs—with helmets, double ammo, full canteens–and take an extra pair of boots. Don’t leave anything behind because you’re going to need all your gear. I want you fully outfitted and prepared for anything that might come up.”
The next morning off they marched, each man loaded down with over fifty pounds of gear, headed for Ellis Beach, ten miles away. Finally, after marching, hot and tired, they arrived at the beach, with their feet hurting, and their packs now seeming to weigh hundreds of pounds. They had been resting just a few moments when a truck rumbled up alongside the platoon.
“Okay,” the drill instructor barked out, “rest a minute, drink some water, then take off your boots, tie them together with these tags I’m handing out. Put your last name and serial number on the tags and throw your boots on the truck. Then get out your spare boots and put ‘em on. We’ll be marching back in five minutes.”
Immediately the men hustled to comply with his orders—except for one man. That lone, non-compliant recruit just stood there, looking despondent and hopeless. The drill instructor noticed him soon, and bellowed in his face, “What’s wrong, Marine? Didn’t you hear me? Tag those boots!”
“But, sir—I—I can’t,” he blurted out in desperation.
“And why not?” challenged the drill instructor.
“Because I didn’t bring my extra boots.”
“Well, that’s just too bad. Off with those boots—now!”
The recruit was desperate now. “But, sir, he implored, “I’ll have to march back barefooted.”
The drill instructor was losing patience. “Tag those boots!” he screamed.
The recruit immediately sat down and hurriedly took off his boots. He looked around at the others, but realized there would be no sympathy from them. There was disdain and condemnation in their faces.
Then the platoon began the march back. They hiked through scrub and briars, palmettos and sandspurs, hot asphalt and concrete. The drill instructor intentionally made the trip back more difficult, causing the barefooted recruit all the pain imaginable. After a while, the recruit could take no more, and dropped out of formation by the side of the road, while the others marched on. He was then ordered into the truck and taken straight to the brig, where he “cooled his heels” for several days, wondering nervously what was going to happen to him. However, after the drill instructor figured he had “learned his lesson,” he rejoined his platoon. He was a model marine from then on.
The recruit had learned his lesson well—and fast. Very few words were exchanged. No attempts were made to find out why he had left his boots behind. He was not referred to a counselor to determine the source of his rebellion and passive-aggressive anger toward the Marine Corps. No attempt was made to reason with him. There was no getting the other men involved, other than they had only viewed his behavior, and how he was dealt with. This was a simple case of, “If you don’t do as I say, then something bad will happen to you!” Tag your boots!
Now some readers may think the drill instructor was too harsh, that the punishment was cruel and unusual. However, others may think he should have been made to march the whole way back, and, doubtless, some drill instructors may have done just that. But the bottom line is the technique worked. The Marines Corps reinforced its authority, the recruit learned a valuable lesson, the platoon progressed forward, and everyone graduated from basic training as full-fledged marines. One could wonder what kind of marines they would have become if the wayward recruit had gotten away with his scheme and was not punished. I contend the platoon would not have been as dedicated and efficient. Thus, the punishment was appropriate.
With this incident, we see illustrated a principle that is the whole point of this essay: if we want to prevent people from committing certain objectionable behaviors, then we must follow their misdeeds with consequences they do not want to happen. However, this punishment must be used selectively and in an appropriate manner. It’s clear that “tagging your boots” is one form of punishment, and punishment is looked upon as anathema by many in our society. Some even view punishment as evil, and should be avoided at all costs. A few years ago, a young man in Singapore broke one of their laws, and was sentenced to be whipped with canes, causing a tremendous uproar around the world—especially with a huge portion of American society, incensed that Singapore would have the audacity to punish a lawbreaker in such a manner.
Since punishment is looked upon by many as one might view a rattlesnake, the science of psychology might allay those feelings somewhat. Scientific studies have repeatedly shown that learned responses of avoidance and fear have a strong impact on our personality development when we are young. Punishment is essential to the development of these inhibitory emotions, which help control inappropriate behaviors that do not serve the individual and the community well. People with no fear and guilt can be dangerous, because they have no internal “inhibitors” that prevent them from committing certain deeds. Conversely, people with a healthy set of fear and guilt feelings are not likely to break many of society’s rules or laws, because these are feelings people tend to avoid, thus the behavior causing them rarely occurs. Misdeeds committed by those who don’t feel guilty—because they weren’t punished as children in a responsible, loving manner—will be repeated over and over.
Other research shows that, with young boys, it is more important that the father administer such discipline rather than the mother. A mother simply has less power to instill appropriate fear and guilt in a son than does the father—although the mother does have some influence. However, as young boys mature, the social-identity process impels them toward males as role models, and a good father is the best model.
This speaks to a disturbing trend currently in our society, whereby we condone and reward single motherhood, producing legions of young men who do not know how to behave as responsible males, because they adopt males outside their families as role models, males who do not always have their best interests at heart. An adolescent male, loaded with testosterone and aggressive hormones, who has not been taught by significant males the proper roles of guilt, shame, and fear, is trouble on the rise. This capacity for fear and guilt is the end product of a sequence of child-rearing activities, using love-oriented punishment, leading to strong identification with the same sex parent. To put it more simply, the best drill instructors for young men in boot camp are males.
One study showed that many anti-social boys tend to come from those homes where the parents were cold, distant, or absent—not from homes that disciplined and punished with love. Sparing the loving rod of discipline tends to produce incomplete children.
Social psychology clearly shows us the complexity of reward and punishment on the development of children’s moral codes and inhibitions, with their willingness to follow society’s rules. Most criminals are people who have not been taught when they were young how to behave properly. However, parents are not totally to blame here: the schools, TV, literature, peers, gangs, and other aspects of our society share in the upbringing of our children, and often teach and reinforce many negative attitudes and behavior. If one accepts the premise that the total society is to blame for criminal behavior, we are then left with a huge, apparently unsolvable dilemma: that, in a free republic, we can’t seem to unite sufficiently to control all these dysfunctional “teachers” of our children to prevent the production of criminals. So, we throw up our hands in despair and do little to solve the problem.
However, complaining is but a temporary catharsis, engaged in by politicians, the media, and citizens of rhetoric. Sensible people know that once our wayward children reach adulthood, as a practical matter, it’s too late to teach them those lessons they needed to learn as children. The horse is already out of the barn, so to speak.
Thus, with the adult criminal we are left with only one option: we have to do whatever is necessary to prevent people from committing crimes. We can’t go inside the heads of such people and change dysfunctional attitudes at this late date—something that is only occassionaly possible using psychotherapeutic techniques, which are slow and prohibitively expensive, and rarely work. (That old joke applies very well here: How many counselors does it take to change a light bulb? A lot, but the bulb has to really want to change.) Thus for people who continuously break laws, if they have no internal roadmap of fear or guilt to stop them, then we as a society must give them some sort of external fear that will stop them. We have to use the threat of punishment to stop their misdeeds. It’s our primary option. Tag your boots!
In alcohol and drug treatment there is a rule that says that once someone becomes physically addicted, they will never be able to safely drink or use drugs again without suffering serious—and often fatal—consequences. Only when the addict arrives at the point where this reality is true for him or her, is there an improved chance for sobriety. If the addict realizes that continued use of alcohol or drugs will cause that person to die or go crazy, there will then be an improved chance for sobriety. The chemical that the addict used to love and cherish so much, becomes the punisher. Tag your boots!
Next, consider the drug smuggler. Anyone with the proper know-how can fly to south America, buy some cocaine, re-enter the United States, sell the cocaine, and make a huge profit, with very little chance of getting caught. This behavior is going on all the time, as many of my former clients related to me in detail. And these smugglers are killing and ruining more lives than can be imagined—costing our society an enormous price. But the drug dealers do not care, and they feel no guilt or fear. Their motivation is greed, with no concern about the human destruction they are causing. There is no little voice inside them saying, “Don’t do that! It’s wrong!” They do it anyway.
The question has become, how do we stop them? Over the years, we have tried many things that do not work: rehabilitation programs, weak prison terms, confiscation of ill-gotten property, increasing public awareness, and patrolling the nation’s point of entries. And each year the smuggling and drug abuse increases, while the public demands more drugs.
But there’s one thing we haven’t done; we have not made these smugglers and dealers tag their boots. How can we do this? Pass and implement laws that say, “If you smuggle drugs into this country, or sell drugs, we’ll catch you, and when we do you will be quickly prosecuted–and executed.” Then the public can sit back and watch the drug trafficking grind to a halt. Tag your boots.
Next, consider illegal immigration. This problem is now out of control, and the Congress and the President hasn’t the knowledge or will to fix it. Some people abroad have the notion that America is the solution to the world’s problems, with the effect that many people in less fortunate parts of the world want to come to America to improve their lives—and there are many Americans willing to let them come, legal or not. Thus, each day thousands of illegal immigrants slip across our borders. If we continue to allow this, it can bankrupt our social-welfare, educational, and work-related systems. With the world’s population projected to double within the next fifty years, the conditions pushing this illegal immigration trend will only increase, thus the problem is not going away.
To get a true fix on the current immigration situation, look at it from an illegal immigrant’s perspective. Here he is living in Mexico or Central America, living in squalor, with no job, no hope for the future, too many children, and a poor societal support system. His children will have a worse life than him, because the future is grim. The population is exploding out of control, resources are dwindling, and the political leaders are helpless to turn things around. It is evident that everyone will have to do with less. However, he has learned that in America, there exists everything he wants and needs. So, one night he slips across the border—and it doesn’t matter if the border patrol sees him or not, because he knows they are under orders not to use force. Eventually he will get a job from someone who is desperate for cheap labor, who will pay him with cash that will not be reported to the government. And even if he is caught, they will simply load him onto an air-conditioned bus and drive him back across the border, where he will keep trying to cross again. He can’t lose. And once he finally gets settled in America, he can manipulate the system, get some welfare benefits and food stamps, make arrangements to get his family across, and send his children to the wonderful, free schools. What a country!
But one thing bothers him; he heard one border guard being interviewed on the radio, saying that thousands of illegal immigrants cross the border each day, and he is powerless to stop them, because he has been forbidden to use force. All he can do is holler on the bullhorn and tell them to go back home—which they never do because there is no punishment for crossing the border. Then the guard says that if he were allowed to shoot just one immigrant—after fair warning—the immigrant flow would stop. It is certain that if prospective illegal immigrants knew they would be shot if they attempted the crossing, they wouldn’t try it. And if no one tried it, no one would be shot. But there is no boot- tagging in the US Immigration Service.
Already some readers of this essay are squirming and shifting in their chairs. They think this is too extreme—shooting illegal immigrants! What would the carnage be like? Moreover, how do you shoot just one illegal immigrant. America is constitutionally incapable of doing this, given the current state of the American psyche. However, there would be less carnage with boot-tagging than without it, and I am sure we could develop other boot-tagging options to replace the shooting of immigrants. With swift, sure consequences hanging over their heads, most people will quit doing those things they shouldn’t. And those few who continue their bad ways—and are dealt with severely—wouldn’t get much sympathy from most Americans. We will save that for the victims.
A woman friend of mine married a man from Iran, with whom she had three sons. Occasionally they would go back to Iran to visit his relatives. One day she absent-mindedly left her purse, with considerable cash in it, on a store counter for several hours after leaving. When she realized what she had done, she rushed back to the store to retrieve it—and it was still in the same place where she had left it. All her cash and possessions were still within; no one had touched or disturbed it. She said that was not unusual in Iran because there is little thievery. Why? Because in Iran, convicted thieves are punished by having a hand cut off! And she said she didn’t see anyone with missing hands. She concluded that thievery had been abolished in Iran. Tag your boots!
Consider the traffic light. Did you ever notice that everyone stops for the red light: rich, poor, crooks, the mentally ill, drunks, rapists, murderers, middle-class, lower-class, high-class—virtually every- one in societies around the world. You name the group and they all stop for red lights. Why do they obey this rule, yet disregard others that we value, which are just as important? It is because the consequence of going through a red light is a boot-tagging situation, whereby the offender stands a high probability of being smashed into by another vehicle.
A counselor friend of mine tells the story about a relative of his in rural Alabama, who had a husband who was “bad to drink,” as they called drunkenness in that area. For years this alcoholic’s main form of recreation was to get roaring drunk several times a month, then come home and beat up and terrorize his wife and children. His wife had endured this for years because she had been taught by her parents and her church to be subservient and obedient to her husband.
But the day came when her tolerance was exhausted; she could endure it no more. One day he came home drunk again, and began calling her derogatory names–then began hitting her. That did it!
For all those years, she had endured his abuse—but no more! This was it—her pot was boiling over! This enraged woman, suddenly energized to the strength of Wonder Woman by her years of pent-up anger, knocked her staggering husband to the floor with a mighty blow with her fist. Then she jumped on top of him, grabbed him by both ears and began beating his head on the floor, screaming, “You drunken bastard, you no-good-son-of-a-bitch, you lousy excuse of a man. I’m going to kill you!” She beat his head on the floor until he stopped moving, believing she had killed him, until she noticed he was still breathing. He was unconscious.
The next morning he got up from the floor, hung-over, battered, and sick—and puzzled. He remembered nothing of what had happened, having been in an apparent alcoholic blackout. All he knew was that he was hurting and sick. “What happened?” he moaned to his wife. “Feels like a truck ran over me. And my ears hurt real bad!”
His wife looked at him long and hard, the fires of anger still raging in her. “A truck did run over you, and that truck was me. And I ain’t putting up with no more of your drunken ways. I beat you last night ‘til I thought you were dead. And if you ever walk back in this house drunk again, I’ll make sure you’re dead the next time.”
He knew she meant it, because she never said things she didn’t mean. He figured that she would kill him—probably shoot him next time. So, he never drank again. Their marriage survived and they both lived into old age. Tag your boots.
As the next illustration of this principle, consider the law of gravity. As we all know, gravity is a universal constant (Just ask Sir Isaac Newton!)—a force that applies around the world. It does not discriminate, and acts equally on each of us regardless of age, sex, race, religious persuasion, or socio-economic status. No matter who you are, gravity will treat all persons equally. There is no discrimination here for malcontents to whine about. We can jokingly note that there has never been a single case in history where the law of gravity showed any favoritism. All people who journey to the top of the Empire State Building, for instance, and jump off, will be treated equally by gravity. No ifs or buts, if you jump you will be a terrific smash on the street below.
Now consider those times when the reader has been on high places and wondered what it would be like to jump off and soar like a bird. Wouldn’t that be thrilling, we think. Most people have had that experience—especially as children when we’re still exploring our world. We can almost experience the thrill of the free fall. Ah, the trip down would be exhilarating—to which all parachutists and bungee jumpers can testify. But we don’t jump. Why? Because we all know the law of gravity will lead to that fatal stop at the end. Tag your boots.
Several thousand years ago, one of the world’s great spiritual leaders, Moses, saw that his people needed some stricter rules to live by, so he went up on a mountain and came back with God’s Ten Commandments. Much like the Marine drill instructor, there were certain rules that God required of his people. But, alas, most people don’t follow them very well, instead treating them more or less like the Ten Suggestions. We no longer seem to require ourselves and others to obey them. Thus, we’ve lost these ancient tag-your-boots rules.
This leads us to an area that needs consideration: namely those roadblocks, currently emphasized in America, that inhibit us from effectively using punishment as a behavioral control for unwanted deviant behavior. One of the primary roadblocks in these times seems to be the confusing matter of rehabilitation vs. punishment. It has gotten to the point that the dream of rehabilitation has insisted that punishment is old school and is no longer needed. Thus, our laws and legal systems have progressed to the point that capital punishment is cruel and unusual. Reasons abound for this stance: he is a sinner, but deserves our forgiveness; Jesus would forgive him, so who are we not to do so; two wrongs don’t make a right; vengeance is mine, says the Lord; criminal behavior is a symptom of mental illness, so he must be treated rather than punished; punishment doesn’t work, only makes the person angrier; etc.
Many reasons are given not to take harsh action against criminals. The problem with this orientation is that it focuses on the criminal, to the neglect of the victim. However, if a person is murdered, then that life is gone forever, and nothing can be done to bring it back. That leaves us with only the perpetrator left to deal with, and it seems we do not have the stomach to apply appropriate punishment. In fact, we seem to no longer be able to determine just what is appropriate punishment for the different crimes.
It is implied by some religions and belief systems that a murdered victim is okay because he is now in the arms of God, gone to Nirvana, is in the spiritual realm of the next world, is one with the Force—whatever. Well, if any of these theories or beliefs is true—and it is so good for the believer—then logically it must also be good for the non-believer. Under this scenario, even the non-believers will experience the realities of the afterlife—though we would hope they would receive some sort of punishment for their earthly misdeeds.
However, if there is no afterlife—and no one can prove it exists—then no one gets any justice when a murderer is rehabilitated, yet the victim is dead and gone forever, missing out on the remaining time of life, while the murderer continues on. Where is the justice in that? The reality of all this is that we have taken the notion of rehabilitation so far that we no longer punish. We have become so tolerant and “forgiving” that we will now endure the most horrible of atrocities, and do little or nothing about them.
It would seem logical that we should punish all criminals after they commit their crimes, then if they accept their punishment in the correct spirit, with a truly remorseful attitude, by paying appropriate restitution to their victims, at that point we will then consider rehabilitation. To illustrate, I was recently leading a group-counseling session of criminals, all of whom were on probation or parole. They were feverishly discussing some recent changes in the ways prisoners were now going to be treated while incarcerated in Georgia. Their biggest concern was a very selfish one, in that some rehabilitation opportunities and privileges were being curtailed or stopped, and they didn’t think that was fair. They said that removing weight-lifting equipment, limiting TV watching, and decreasing educational opportunities was going to make prisoners angrier and would cause more trouble. At no time was there any concern for the victims of their crimes. When I brought up the notion that prison was a place for punishment for crimes, and that punishment ought to come first, they launched into all kinds of rationalizations, that rehabilitation was the only way to prevent future crimes. They had little understanding of the role of punishment in their lives, and I deduced that they had experienced little appropriately applied punishment for misdeeds when they were young. To them prison was a resting spot on the difficult journey of life—but certainly not a well-timed punishment.
A second roadblock is the principle to love one’s neighbor as yourself, or, turn the other cheek. Philosophically this is a cryptic message, especially to an angry person who has been wronged. It is true that if a man kills my brother, and I allow myself to become possessed with anger and a desire for revenge, then it will hurt me psychologically. Feelings of hate hurt the one who hates, but it is almost impossible to let go of hate without justice. Since most religions and civil laws do not allow citizens to take justice into their own hands, then it is the responsibility of the State to secure justice for the people by administering the appropriate punishment to law-breakers. Simply following one’s religious dictates is not enough. Balancing the scales of justice requires that the church and State each administer their prescribed roles, with the punishment of criminals being the province of the State—with forgiveness (as they are being punished) being the responsibility of the victim’s religious beliefs.
It will be noted, for Christians, that Jesus, before and during his crucifixion, never said that the Romans did not have the authority to kill him, nor did he excuse the two thieves crucified along with him by condemning the Romans’ legal authority Thus, it is clear that Jesus recognized Rome’s authority to punish (Render unto Caesar that which is Caesars). So it would seem that we’ve boiled it down to justice versus love, and that seems to be the sticking point in many people’s minds. And since these concepts appear to be mutually exclusive, most people jump on one side or the other, while berating the opposite side for being so stupid or unfeeling.
To resolve this dilemma ask yourself this question: Am I showing my love if I allow you to break the laws and do nothing to punish you? The following is what is meant by the principle of loving your neighbor as yourself: Mr. Lawbreaker, society cares about you and respects you as a person, and we want you to have as much individual freedom as possible to pursue your own happiness, but if your pursuit conflicts with your neighbor’s rights, then our legal authorities have the right and duty to punish you appropriately, and we will take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that you don’t detract from your neighbors rights. If done properly, this will re-establish your relationship with your neighbor. That is the obligation of the society at large. Whether you get forgiveness and love as a neighbor from me is my burden under my relationship with God.
This religious philosophizing is well and good, and we can take whatever position we like, but our country is not a theocracy; it’s a republic run by secular laws, representing Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, atheists, heathens, Satanists, or any other religion one chooses to follow. So. In practice, our nation of laws is the product of the thinking of our Founding Fathers, following a variety of beliefs, sometimes with those beliefs suspended, in order that compromises can be reached to enact laws necessary for us to function in this non-spiritual world. Jesus recognized that these differences are not easily bridged, especially when he talked about rendering unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s, and unto God that which is God’s. This is a critical distinction that we conveniently keep ignoring, but these two worlds are different, and there will always be a wall between them.
Though this secular world is separate from the spiritual one, we nonetheless need to keep them in harmony with each other. Things need to be kept moral and on course. We do not need immoral laws, but we cannot allow religions to impose theological beliefs that conflict with our constitutionally-based laws. Without this congruence our society will eventually dissolve. Religion does not have all the answers needed to effectively deal with the practical, material world, which is the reason we have a secular government as opposed to a theocracy. In this world, the majority of our efforts are spent dealing with matter, information, facts and people–hopefully guided by logic, reason, science, laws and religion. Until we discover better ways to inhibit and prevent negative behavior from our misbehaving brothers and sisters, we must make them tag their boots.
There are endless examples of not tagging our boots, such as parents who don’t set limits with their children, resulting in the kids subsequently walking all over them; welfare agencies that dole out benefits without adequate requirements or consequences; a judicial system that emphasizes rehabilitation over punishment, and gives psychobabble excuses to criminal behavior; speed limits on our highways that are rarely enforced, and to which no one pays attention; pampered athletes for whom a contract is always something to be renegotiated without fulfilling the original terms, with owners letting them get away with it, and then complaining about the selfishness of the players; politicians who never say what they mean, but always looking good when lying, with the electorate voting them back into office anyway, and then complaining how crooked they are; tobacco company executives who, in spite of all the scientific evidence to the contrary, and a half million deaths per year, continued to lie about the dangers of smoking, yet most of us do nothing and continue to use their products; and millions of couples taking marriage vows before God, the law, and their friends about loving and honoring each other their entire lives, yet divorcing at the slightest provocations—with the children suffering for it. The list is endless.
So, where do we go from here? As you may have already guessed, it is too late to administer loving, child-rearing discipline after the child is grown. Therefore, we have a sizable number of spoiled, undisciplined, whining, lawbreaking people who are causing this society enormous problems. With them, it is too late to instill the control mechanisms of guilt and fear, which would impel them to obey our laws. However, while punishment will not change their psyches, it will quickly and surely stop certain behaviors in most cases. In a perfect world, we’d like to raise all our children to become model citizens of their own volition, but that is rarely possible. So we have no choice but to make them tag their boots.

THE END

THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT

THE BUTTERFLY EFFECT

By

Joe Wilkins

Copyright © 2015

 

The butterfly effect is a phrase that is being used more these days, but very few people really know what it means or how the term originated. However, to those readers who like to contemplate the mysterious, metaphysical aspects of our lives, I am hopeful this article will be of interest and benefit.

A useful definition of the term, butterfly effect, would be: Any event that occurs now, inevitably dictates or changes certain things in the future, but those future events are usually impossible to predict.

Let’s look at a hypothetical example: In our first scenario Little Bobby is up at bat for his Little League team in the final championship game in the bottom of the last inning. The bases are loaded and his team  is behind three runs—needing four runs to win. Bobby proceeds to hit a grand slam homerun, and his team wins. He is instantly a hero. In the aftermath, in his community, he becomes the boy that all remember, and he receives much respect and adulation. This in turn convinces him that he is a good athlete and should consider taking baseball very seriously during the rest of his life. Because of this he puts much more effort into baseball, wins a college scholarship, plays well in college, gets professional offers, goes to the minor leagues, but gets hurt and can play no more. He spends the rest of his life working as a salesman, a job he doesn’t much like, but which provides a modest living for him and his family.

In the alternative to the above scenario, instead of hitting the home run, he strikes out and his team goes down in disappointing defeat. He is disappointed that he did not get a hit, that he let his team down, and soon thereafter begins to lose his passion for baseball. Instead, he puts more energy into his other interests, especially science, going on to college and becoming a civil engineer, working on many satisfying building projects. Later, he starts his own construction company and becomes quite wealthy.

Thus, the reader can see that in that one instant of time, with that final swing of the bat—one time hitting the ball for a home run, the second time striking out—Bobby’s life is completely altered onto two different pathways. Of course, in both of the above scenarios there were other butterfly effect moments in Bobby’s life as he followed each particular pathway, but the key moment was the swing of the bat, and whether he hit the ball—or missed!

An axiom of the butterfly effect would be this: After each  episode in life, there always follows a particular set of circumstances and events that emerge  from that event. Rephrased, following each behavior there always follow particular circumstances, some of which are of our choosing, but many of which lead to “unintended consequences.” Some common examples that lead to differing results are: marrying one girl or husband instead of another; accepting a particular job; moving into a certain neighborhood; walking down a particular street and getting robbed; a golfer selecting a four iron over a five iron, and getting a hole-in-one; driving down an alternative street and getting into an auto accident. It is easy to see that in many ways life is like a crap game. We toss the dice and get different results most of the time.

But now, dear reader, you must be wondering what has all this to do with butterflies and their effects? Where did that term come from and how does it relate to what has been discussed thus far?

How I came upon this concept is rather unusual. It was the Fall of 1953, I was in the 11th grade, reading an EC Comics, science-fiction, comic book story. The story was set in the year 2055, and time travel was an established activity. One particular company promoted safaris, whereby, for a considerable fee, hunters could travel back to the age of dinosaurs, and shoot a T-Rex dinosaur for a trophy. When the hunter and guides arrived at their destination, they were required to remain on “levitation pathways,” which suspended them above ground so as not to contact the environment and disturb anything. When the hunter, a man named Echels, confronts a T-Rex, the ferocious beast terrifies him, and he jumps off the pathway and runs through the jungle. His guides are furious with him, but they have to kill the T-Rex for their own safety. They locate Echels, then make him do some needed things to minimize the “damage.” Then all return to the year 2055.

However, when they get back, they notice some drastic changes in their society: English words are spelled and spoken strangely, people behave differently–and election results for the President have been reversed from what they were when they left. When Echels sits and takes his muddy boots off, he notices a crushed butterfly on his sole, and it is clear that the death of that butterfly, crushed as he ran in panic through the jungle back in pre-history, set off a chain of events that altered history thereafter. Thus, the phrase, butterfly effect, had its beginnings. In the following years, others have picked up on the phrase, especially weather scientists and forecasters.

I later learned that this EC Comics story was excerpted from a short story, “A Sound of Thunder,” written by famous science-fiction writer, Ray Bradbury, for Collier’s magazine, issue of 6/28/1952, and was later re-published In Playboy magazine in June, 1956. There was a movie made based on the story, but it was poorly done, and has deservedly been mostly forgotten.

What is the point of all this, you may ask? Surely this is something of interest only to philosophically-minded people. What has it got to do with my life? Good questions.

Let me illustrate with  two personal examples.

My maternal grandfather, Ballard Lynch, was an Army surgeon. He was drafted in 1918 and sent to the battlefields of France. He was newly married and had his only child, my mother, just three months before he was shipped overseas. He saw my mother, as an infant, just a few times. In France, he was immediately sent to the front lines to address the wounds of the American soldiers. In a makeshift “hospital,” consisting of blankets and cots on the ground, he and two other doctors were attending to the wounded. Suddenly, an artillery shell hit next to them killing him and one other doctor. This was just two weeks before the war ended. That shell, killing him was a “butterfly” moment for me. Tragic as it was, it forever altered my maternal grandmother’s life, thrusting her onto a life’s pathway she otherwise would not have been on. It led to my mother being raised in a different community and under different circumstances than would have never otherwise happened, whereby she grew up, met, and married my father, producing me, my brother and sister. Without grandfather’s  death I would not exist, much less be writing on this subject. A sadness that I feel about my grandfather was that I never got to know and enjoy life with him, and the despair I feel when I think about the fact that without his death in France, I wouldn’t exist.

A second instance occurred with my paternal grandfather, in frontier Colorado in the early 1900’s, when there occurred an event which guaranteed my existence. Grandfather escaped from a fall down  into a deep well, miles from anyone on the prairie. His escape efforts are described elsewhere on this web site, under the category, Remembrances, “A Western Story.” The fact that he escaped near death, enabled him to later have my father. If he had died, I would not exist.

Therefore, we can see that each of our existences is strongly dictated by chance, or types of butterfly effects. While I am glad I had the opportunity to live and experience life, I am also acutely aware of how chancy and fragile life can be. We are each the product of countless butterfly effects, leading to our very existence, our good fortunes, and even the bad things that happen to us.  To minimize the negative consequences we need to control future butterfly effects as best we can by examining our current behavior and following those pathways that have the highest probability of leading to good outcomes. However, the follow-up of unintended consequences is often hard to overcome. (Politicians, please pay attention!)

Perhaps, the greatest positive outcome of a specific butterfly effect, was the crucifixion of Jesus. Suppose Pontius Pilate had ignored the crowds and freed Jesus instead of Barabbas. What would have followed? Who knows.

Elsewhere on this website is a contemplative-opinion article, entitled “Searching for God,” under the Religious/Spiritual category. When I wrote this article I did not have the butterfly effect in mind, but it is a fact that the very creation of our solar system, as it is now structured, is the result of a series of cosmic, butterfly effects.

To thinking people, there is nothing new about all this. We all know that B follows A—as well as X, Y, Z, and a bunch of other things! We just need to take reasonable care with our behavior, so that which follows is most likely what we desire.

SEARCHING FOR GOD

SEARCHING FOR GOD

By

Joe Wilkins

Copyright © 2014

The concept of God is no longer entrenched as firmly in the minds of people as was in the past. Ancient people always had a god or gods they worshiped, were fearful of, looked to for answers on the human condition, and other aspects of their world that were a mystery to them. They looked to these spiritual guides to tell them why good people suffer, how humankind came into being, what lay in the future, what happens when they die, what was the purpose of their existence, etc.

To answer these questions certain people, such as priests, medicine men, shamans, preachers, prophets and others, developed “callings” to help get the answers. These were usually men, who were anointed or called into these professions, and were given high status by their peers and community for their unique abilities. In some cases they were elevated to be the objects of worship themselves. The qualities they all had in common was the belief that they possessed personal deity or had communication with higher powers, who would communicate with them about the realities of the spiritual world.

This essay will deal mainly with the Christian religion, since the author is a Christian and is not well versed in other religious belief systems. However, they all have some common ground, so the reasoning in this essay will apply to all in varying degrees. It should be noted, however, that this essay falls into the category of informed personal opinion, and is not intended to devalue any religious belief system. The possibilities inherent in this treatise are that it is completely or partially off base, or at least has some connection to reality. The subject matter is difficult, and may be difficult for some people to accept. The author apologizes to anyone who may be offended. Your opinion and reasoned critique of this writing is valued.

One of the problems that religions struggle with today—and have since the advent of Renaissance scholars such as Galileo, Copernicus, and others—is that some of the findings of science call into question some of the specifics of the various religions. If a person is well trained in the scientific method, and accepts it as a valid means of exploring and seeking the truth of this world and the afterlife, often there have occurred inevitable conflicts between scientific discoveries and certain aspects of religious belief systems. The paradox, of course, is that the scientific method was created to study the nature of our world and the universe, but it is grossly deficient at discovering the realities of the spiritual world.

Assuming there is a spiritual world, the scientific method has failed to verify it. There have been anecdotal experiences of individuals who claimed to have had experiences and knowledge of the afterlife, but none has held up to rigorous scientific scrutiny. From a scientific perspective, religious beliefs may seem to be much like believing in flying saucers or visitors from alien worlds, and we just have not been able come up with evidence that withstands rigorous investigation. The transition from our real world to the spiritual one seems to have an impenetrable wall, through which science is woefully deficient at penetrating.

One explanation for this deficiency is that the scientific method was developed by the finite minds of men, which, while brilliant and with vast potential, finite minds cannot comprehend an infinite universe. Our minds can only understand those parts of infinity that are “visible.” For example, suppose the universe is infinite, with no end, and goes on forever and ever. Can we really understand that? I contend that we cannot, because we are limited by the cause-and-effect phenomenon, a limitation imposed on our limited minds, dictating that when viewing the Milky Way and the rest of the Universe on a clear night, we cannot really understand the immensity,  how it all began, and perhaps someday will end.

One current scientific theory as to our beginning is the “Big Bang” theory, which hypothesizes that several billion years ago all matter or energy in the Universe was confined in one small spot, which “exploded” and evolved into what we know today. This stretches our common sense brains—but we are finite–so there is obviously more here than we can understand. Even acceptance of the Big Bang leaves us with the question of what went on before that event. Some cosmologists have used higher mathematics to devise theories or explanations about all this, and have come up with the ideas that there may even be eleven universes—or perhaps an infinite number of them! How can our finite minds even begin to comprehend such matters, always remembering that any system devised by our finite minds– in this case higher mathematics–will have its finite limitations, incapable of understanding an infinite universe—if indeed it is infinite.  Finiteness can never understand infinity; it can only present the concept, but is doomed to never “get inside” and fully understand it.

If we consider the possibility that the universe is not infinite, but does have limits, then our endeavor is simpler, and we may possibly come to an understanding of it someday. For then our finite minds will be able to use the scientific method—or any other method we devise—to come closer to the reality in which we find ourselves in the cosmos. Even with this scenario, however, we still face a monumental problem: finiteness itself can be complicated beyond comprehension, as evidenced by the complexity of our DNA structure or the neural pathways of the human brain. It has been estimated that our brains have about one hundred billion neurons, which have a number of interconnections that exceeds the number of atoms in the known Universe! Now, this may be an over-calculation, but all will agree the number is huge. Even so, the brain is still finite and has its limits.

I am a great admirer of science, without which we would all still be living in caves or the savannahs, trying to stay alive by eating whatever wild creatures or plants we could scrounge up. Thus, it is my contention that until future humans develop infinite brains, we are doomed to understand our universe just one small part at a time, but we will never be able to comprehend the entire picture. If one could do that, would not he or she be God?

Nevertheless, the evolving principles of modern cosmology require one to have a very high IQ to understand these theories, which dooms most of us to some vague notion of what is going on, and Heaven help us in explaining them to others. Recently, one very brilliant scientist stated that he had read Stephen Hawkings’ book on the nature of the Universe twice, and he still did not understand it!

Therefore, we are in need of some understanding that will be beneficial to us all. That is the purpose of this essay; but we must remember, it is being written by a person with a finite mind.

Let us examine a few religions that have been unproven scientifically, but are held strongly within our belief-faith systems and see where that takes us.

Christians, first of all, have the belief that Jesus Christ was born of a virgin mother, and after execution was raised from the dead, and ascended into heaven. Now, science says all this is impossible. There has never been a scientifically, verifiable instance where a dead person came back to life, much less ascended into Heaven and reappeared on Earth. And there has never been any proof of a virgin birth. But this does not mean these events could not have happened; it’s just that science cannot confirm or disprove them. Moreover, if there is no omnipotent, universal, infinite God, these events are most likely impossible! However, just because something has never happened before or since does not mean it could not have happened that one time. The Big Bang was supposedly a onetime event, and was much more miraculous than the events recorded in the New Testament. However, if there is an infinite God, then all this is possible, because an infinite creator of either an infinite or finite universe, has infinite power and can use that power to do anything He desires. Put yourself in such a God’s shoes. You have created your Universe, with the planet Earth among others, and you decide to make a virgin pregnant, and she births a son who can relate to the rest of your creation in ways finite humans can understand.  It is easier for the average person to understand Jesus—because he is flesh and blood—than to comprehend an omnipotent Creator. However, people cannot scientifically understand virgin birth and bodily resurrection, so they are forced to accept them on faith, or reject them.

So, Mary has God’s baby, Jesus, and he preaches and spreads his wishes to his finite-thinking followers. Then Jesus angers and confuses many, so they crucify him. Then God brings him back to life, which with His infinite power is possible, because if you can create a Universe from nothing there is no problem in bringing a dead body back to life. Moreover, just because God has never done it again, does not mean it did not happen. Jesus is then witnessed by many people for a short time, according to  historical records—which is not scientific proof, but is eyewitness testimony, and is better than no evidence. All this is the basis of the Christian religion, and if it is true—as many of us believe– then that’s all there is to say about it. But we must remember that there are many thoughtful, intelligent people people who do not believe Jesus was the son of God; they acknowledge that he did exist, but was more or less  like the rest of humankind, and was a great teacher and prophet.

Muslims have their Mohammed, who had a different relationship with God than did Jesus. Moses and Joseph Smith were different also. The record of their relationship and experiences with God are each unique and slightly different, but we cannot scientifically say their experiences did not happen—they just can’t be proven scientifically. There is only faith.

Thus, we find ourselves somewhat at a dead-end scientifically. Faith leaves many people hanging between belief, partially believing, not believing, wondering, hoping, or any other mental state that gives them comfort–or induces anxiety–about this whole business. In short, we are doomed to never know for sure—leaving us only with faith to cling to if we choose to believe in God.

However, there is a part of humankind’s achievement that can comfort us with some assurance when appplied to what science has found about the Universe thus far. And that achievement is mathematics. Strictly speaking, mathematics is not a science, but is a special language we have devised, and it is used to investigate certain aspects of reality in which scientists are seeking knowledge. Specifically, I am talking about the laws of probability. In mathematics, probability is defined as the likelihood of the occurrence of any particular form of an event (the existence of God in this case), estimated as the ratio of the number of ways in which that form might occur, to the number of ways in which the event might occur in any form. Rephrasing, this means that, of the various ways things could have formed in our solar system to give us humankind, compared to the other ways things could have happened, is the probability that we exist as we are. If the probability is very high it suggests that we are not likely the product of chance, but might just be the result of some divine, intervention plan of God—or other First Cause.

Let us look at some of the events that science has determined to have happened and how they add up, demonstrating that we are likely more than the result of chance occurrences.

We will use the simple formula for probability familiar to students of advanced algebra. This formula is expressed as follows: Probability = probability 1, x probability 2, x probability 3, etc. For example, the probability that I can toss a coin and come up with heads 5 times in a row is P=p1xp2xp3xp4xp5 where each toss has one chance in two of being heads. Our formula would then be P=1/2×1/2×1/2×1/2×1/2, with P =1/32, or one chance in thirty-two that I could get five heads in a row. .

Given this understanding, let us look at the probability factors of events that have occurred on earth, which have resulted in life as we know it on our planet. We will then speculate as to whether God caused all this to happen

1) The Earth’s geological composition. Originally, the Earth was a hot ball of rocks and metal, resulting from an amalgamation of cosmic particles that coalesced to form our planet. There was no water originally. Odds of this happening: Let us be conservative, and say 1 chance in 10.

2) The Earth’s size, composition, and gravitational pull is just right to hold on to our atmosphere, something Mars and other moons and planets do not have because they are too small—if they ever had much atmosphere at all. Odds: 1/10

3) Earth’s acquisition of water is the result of icy asteroids, comets, or moons hitting the earth, and at the right time, helping to cool down the crust, providing the planet with a basic necessity for the formation of life. Odds: 1/100

4) The Earth is just the right distance from the Sun to support life as we know it. Mercury and Venus are too close, with Mercury having no atmosphere or rotation, with Venus having an atmosphere, but the surface temperature being about 800 degrees. Mars is too far. Odds: 1/1000

5) The earth has a magnetic field, due to an iron core, which protects us from fatal cosmic radiation from the sun. Odds: 1/5

6) The earth rotating as it does, giving us the seasons. Odds: 1/5

7) There is evidence that the moon was formed after a collision between another astral body and the Earth during the solar system’s formative days. Our moon’s size and distance from Earth is precisely what we require and is critical to our existence. This confluence of events regulates the tides at the optimum rate, prevents wobbling as the Earth spins. If the Earth wobbled there would be radical rising  and falling  of temperatures and tides. Odds: 1/1000

8) The asteroid that hit the earth 65 million years ago at the end of the Cretaceous period and caused the demise of the dinosaurs, allowed life as we now know it to form. A little known fact about this episode was that most of the dominant plants and animals were reduced or wiped out, leaving animals and flowering plants we have today to evolve. Odds: 1/1000

9) For reasons too complicated to illustrate here, the size, structure and position of the planet Jupiter caused our solar system to form in its present manner. Without Jupiter, humankind would not exist. Odds: 1/1000

There are numerous other things that have occurred which have contributed to life as we know it on Earth. But with just the above 9 factors, the estimated odds of all these events occurring is huge, represented by the formula of: P = 1/10 x 1/10 x 1/100 x 1/1000 x 1/5 x 1/5 x 1/1000 x 1/1000 x 1/1000. This gives the probability that the Earth as we know it had only one chance in 250 quadrillion of becoming what it is. And, realistically, the figure has to be much higher than that, if we plug into the equation many of the other events that occurred in Earth’s formation and development.

What does this mean? Either we are strictly the result of a series of monumental, cosmic accidents, the probability of which is unimaginable, or we are the result of some planned creative effort over billions of years, resulting in a planet that gave birth to and supports our form of life.

There is some speculation that there are lower forms of life on other bodies in our solar system, many of which have water, and future space probes will investigate this. There is also the supposition that life may have originated on other worlds, and was transported to Earth in the early days by comets and/or meteors. If this proves out, what are the odds of this happening also?

In approaching the hypothesis that God created the Universe, we are faced with the limits of science, which can only investigate objective reality– that which is measureable. Science has to assume that there is an objectively real Universe if it is to be investigated. Moreover, what science has discovered about the Universe thus far has been objective—though there are still many unknowns, but they promise to be discovered and analyzed in the future.

Thus, science can only determine the real, substantial, objective Universe around us. It cannot determine the existence of God, or anything of a spiritual nature. That reality is only known through faith, but it cannot be proven.

So how do we get to the next level, given that science cannot prove there to be a God?

Consider that philosophical rule called Occam ’s razor, which states that any theory that introduces the least new assumptions is preferred by science. Otherwise, we could introduce any number of theories as to how the Universe was formed—which is what all the cosmologists are doing today. However, if the Universe is infinite, and is unguided by a Creator, all things are possible—and in fact will occur! There is the old story that if the Universe is infinite, and you seat down an infinite number of monkeys at typewriters, and if they typed away forever, then they would ultimately produce every piece of literature that mankind has produced—and would produce forever.   Since the human mind is finite that avenue of discovery is doomed to an ambigious journey, which is what is happening with the theories of multiple or alternate Universes, black hole speculation, quantum theories, etc.

Science, and the scientific method, are thus stopgap measures that our finite minds use to determine the reality around us. This means that we are doomed to uncertainty, and we will remain is this fog of unknowing if the Universe is infinite. However, if the Universe is finite there is hope that someday we can figure it out. Nevertheless, don’t hold your breath.

Thus, our Occam principle says that we should go with the theory that has the fewest assumptions about Creation, which is that God created it. This theory has the advantage of being the simplest, most understandable and encompassing, and gives us answers that science cannot. The only other alternative is to believe in nothing, that the Universe came into being on its own.

However, this does not conform to what science has thus far proven. For example, there is evidence for the Big Bang from telescopic observation and cosmic investigation, but there is no explanation how this explosion from nothing created all the matter we can see with our telescopes. Agnostics and atheists cannot give us an answer to the question: How did a secular Universe come into being from nothing?

The God-cause gives us the only answer at this time. Our finite minds can conceive of a spiritual being—separate from our material Universe, with infinite power—who could create something out of nothing, but this cannot be proven—only taken as an act of faith. Then we are faced with the same problem the agnostics and atheists have: how did God come into being? This is the question that causes the gulf between non-believers and believers. The agnostics and atheists say it all started with the Big Bang, but cannot explain what there was before, while religious folks cannot tell what was before God—if anything. Religious folks can only say, “God always was, and always will be! Thus, we come to an impasse between the two groups.

Thus, we seem to be at an epistemological dilemma, whereby our quest for knowledge comes to a dead-end.

It is at this point that we have to use some finite, scientific, common sense. Looking at the God-concept, we can ask someone to come up with a better idea, recognizing that most of the great minds in history have done so, and have convinced themselves there is a God, because it answers most of the unknowable questions. However, we find that no one has given us a good alternative. Many people go through life believing there is no God and accept that at the end of their lives there is nothingness. That is discomforting, because most people, when they get to their final days, psychologically need to believe in something beyond them. The old adage that there are no atheists in foxholes is almost 100% true.

Therefore, we can use the probability suppositions we have discussed to circumvent the limitations of science, and with great confidence propose that the formation of our universe had a God creating it. Otherwise we have a one chance in 250 quadrillion that He did not. This would then mean that we are the result of a great cosmic lottery, that out of all the possibilities of things that could have happened to produce the planet earth as it now exists, our existence is just one big accident. Now an accident like ours could have happened in an infinite or exceedingly complex universe, beating those odds of one in 250 quadrillion, but it does not appear likely.

So where does all this leave us? An informed opinion by this author proposes that there has to be a God. It’s clear that we cannot scientifically prove there is a God, but humankind definitely does need a God. We have demonstrated throughout history that our existence alone is not enough. Some thinkers have continually believed that we could create heaven on Earth if we would only pull the pieces together. Revolutionary forms of government have been the methods we have tried the most: the United Nations; US Constitution; Articles of Confederation; the British unwritten constitution; Russian, Chinese, Cuban, North Korean, and Vietnamese communism; etc; but they have proven themselves severely lacking in many areas. They certainly have not created a non-violent, peaceful world. Actually, these systems made things better in the short term in many cases, with the American system arguably the best of the lot, but they all have been plagued with a lot of dysfunction and evil, as anyone looking around the world today can testify. The world has not been free of war and strife during humankind’s entire existence.

Thus, we have proven that we are unable to create Heaven on Earth. Moreover, those today who believe that it is possible to do so forget, or are ignorant of our history. All attempts, either social or political, have failed because of humankind’s many sins of commission and omission. We seem to be able to calm things down for brief periods, but later we always degenerate into dysfunction.

Therefore, it is my contention that we cannot count on the world to improve beyond what has already been demonstrated. For all who believe and try to practice the Golden Rule, to love our neighbors as ourselves, they are countered by significant opposition that does not believe this, and the two factions are continually at war with one another.

While humankind wants a peaceful world, we have thus far been unable to achieve it. But mankind needs peace to counter the violence and dysfunction. If we cannot get it in this world, then perhaps we will in the afterlife, which offers hope from our Earthly despair. In one sense, it does not matter if there is a God or not—we need one! So, many believe in a God who offers hope, on which we can live a better life for ourselves and our neighbors. If there is no God then we have to invent one, because the God within each of us will never let us down as do the systems of this world.

In conclusion, there are those who believe that science is the enemy of religion, a thesis with which I disagree. The further I have explored both science and religion, I have concluded they are not in opposition with one another, seeming to compliment each other more and more with the passage of new discoveries and insights. The God of my understanding is good, because if he is evil then what’s the point… A good God would not allow humankind to develop the system of science, allowing us to deceive ourselves with deceptive thinking. Thus, science is a tool of God’s, which with each new discovery, draws us closer to all of His magnificent creation. The fundamental religions of the world are fearful of this progress, because it means they may have to alter some of their beliefs, which is, admittedly, very difficult to do. Fear of such change can hold us back, but the mysterious truth of God will draw us closer and closer to Him, if we will only keep our minds open.

 

 

WHERE ART THOU, JETHRO?

WHERE ART THOU, JETHRO?

By Joe Wilkins

Copyright © 2015

 

 

At the time of the founding of the United States of America, no governments on the face of the Earth were designed to provide their people with freedom, economic prosperity, and peace. All governments that existed at that time were structured to exploit their citizens, keep them in poverty, be of benefit to privileged rulers, and keep their youth ready for wars against other nations.

Thus, our Founding Fathers faced a monumental task: how to create and organize a fledgling nation into one that gave its people a voice in their own governance. After much research by Thomas Jefferson and several other Founding Fathers, the rough structure of our new government evolved in their minds. The US Constitution was the result of their efforts. However, it is doubtful if many academic courses in US history have given notice and credit to the earlier, historical events that created the roadmap followed by the Founders, as they struggled to create a constitution to adequately serve this new nation.

To fully understand the process the Founders studied, modified, and adopted, we must go back in history to the ancient Israelites and examine the government they developed, and then look at what the Anglo Saxons did to improve it.

Aside from its religious connotations, the Bible is among the most important historical references of early, civilized humankind. The Bible describes much of mankind’s early history, and we will use this record to document our reasoning, hopefully satisfying Christians, Jews, and non-believers alike.

We begin with the books of Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers, which in elaborate detail outline the events of Moses and his people as they escaped slavery under the Egyptians. A popular image in most people’s minds, unintentionally promoted by movies and sketchy Sunday school classes, has given many Christians and Jews the idea that Moses was in command of a small band of followers. However, Exodus gives their numbers as 603,550 men who were fit for military duty, with the total number perhaps exceeding three million, counting women, children, and elderly men.

Now, that is too many people for one person to manage. Moses initially tried to govern these people alone, following the methods he had learned while serving under Pharaoh. Imagine three million people, in the middle of the Sinai wilderness, having just gained their freedom, trying to reorganize their lives in order to survive. As one might imagine, they had many kinds of problems, so they went to Moses to resolve their difficulties. According to Exodus, Moses’ method was to sit from morning to evening, listening to the complaints, trying to resolve—by himself—all the disputes that these people brought before him! An impossible task, obviously.

Thankfully, Moses’ father-in-law, Jethro, soon arrived into the camp from Midian, and he noticed the folly of Moses’ method of governance. He said to Moses, “What you are doing is not good. You and the people with you will wear yourselves out, for the thing is too heavy for you; you are not able to perform it alone.”

Moses listened to Jethro’s advice, and followed his instructions to set up a different method of governance. (The Bible does not tell where Jethro learned this method.) Moses then appointed capable, godly, honest men as judges, setting up a manageable leader’s hierarchy of thousands, hundreds, fifties, and tens. Moses made the top selections of new leaders himself, and they in turn then picked additional leaders on down the hierarchy. Granted they were not elected at the beginning stage, and Exodus does not give us all the details, but it is clear that a people-oriented, selection process evolved.  Thus, the burden of governing this large group of Israelites was distributed to the people themselves, leaving Moses and the higher-ups to judge only those cases that could not be resolved by those at the more local levels. This was the first instance in recorded history that a republic form of government was created. As an aside, this writer wonders why he has never heard a sermon about this whole process. It is a critical event in Biblical history, inspiring our Founder Fathers to create a constitution giving religious freedom to all US citizens.

The Old Testament books, outlining the life of Moses, illustrate how this advice from Jethro evolved into what we now recognize as the republic form of governing people. And the Founding Fathers—especially Jefferson—being scholarly, religiously versed men, very knowledgeable about the Bible, were deeply influenced by Moses’ experience, as they searched for ways to structure the new American government, in reaction to the abuses they were suffering at the hands of the British. Also, being descendents of Anglo Saxon Europeans, the Founders were aware that these ancestors, who originated in the Black Sea area of the Middle East, came from the same area where the Ten Tribes of Israel were thought to have disappeared. It appears reasonable that the Anglo Saxons may have mixed and intermarried with these tribes, and adopted Moses’ republic form of government as a result.   At the very least, the Anglo Saxons were probably culturally influenced by these “lost” Israelites, adopting their form of government, and, over time, spread these new ideas and methods throughout Europe as they migrated westward. As opposed to being ruled by kings, despots and warlords, they originated a more “people oriented” form of governance.

The Anglo Saxons spread all over Europe, influencing indigenous people, conquering and intermarrying royalties, reforming tribal customs, and establishing their new form of government. They fundamentally transformed Europe, and eventually colonized Iceland, Greenland, and Canada. There are even accounts they came into America and intermarried with Indians in Wisconsin, eventually migrating to the Dakotas, substantiated by reports of blue-eyed Indians in the Midwest. However, all of these New World adventures ultimately failed and disappeared into obscure history.

It is clear that a republic form of government was becoming increasingly necessary. Early in humankind history the most common form of government were tribes, which being small, could manage their affairs in rather informal ways. But as the tribes increased in  size, more order was needed, so various forms of leadership developed, including chieftains, sultans, despots, or other top-of-the pyramid-type leaders, who usually cared less for their subjects than their own ambitions. As long as the tribes remained relatively small, existing as hunter-gatherers, foraging off the natural resources of the land, this method worked.  However, with increasing numbers of people, the development of agriculture evolved to feed them. In fact, the Jewish people in Egypt existed under an agricultural system, but were slaves of the Pharaohs, who needed to keep the Jews in slavery to make their system work. Ultimately, this system broke down, and Moses led the enslaved Jews out of Egypt. Once free, these Jews needed a new form of government.

From Moses time to the American Revolution, the Anglo Saxons slowly evolved a system that gave more power to the people. Admittedly it was not a perfect system, consisting of kings, dukes, knights, earls, freeman, indentured servants and others, but it was a process that was heading toward giving individuals more power and freedom to pursue their own best interests in life. It is amazing that the Founding Fathers were aware of all this. It is a tribute to their intelligence, scholarship, dedication, and desire for more individual freedom for themselves and their fellow citizens, that they were able to take this evolving form of government to its highest level in the form of the US Constitution. In, fact Jefferson made copies of their laws and distributed them to his friends and to the other Founders. He was convinced that the system of government developed under Moses, adopted and modified by the Anglo Saxons over the centuries, was the wisest and most perfect ever devised by mankind. It was the stimulus of his and the Founders efforts in developing our Constitution. And it took considerable courage for them to do this, because had they failed they would have been executed by the English.

At this time it now appears that our republic form of government is increasingly being disregarded. Rather than affirming and strengthening it, many are now trying to revert back to the old ways by applauding failed systems of government: fascism, communism, socialism, despotism–in short, forms of government that seek to take away the core value of republic governments, which is individual liberty in as many areas of life that can be responsibly allowed.

One issue that needs to be addressed is the tendency of many Americas to call our current government a “democracy.”  It is not a democracy in the pure government sense. Students of government know there is a subtle difference between a democracy and a republic. A democracy is a form of government in which the ultimate power resides in the people, which is exercised directly by them or by their elected representatives under a free electoral system. In a republic the supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitled to vote, and that power is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them. Rephrasing, democracy is  government  directly by the people, and a republic is a government governed by elected representatives.

As we can see, in a democracy, the majority rules, and mob rule is possible, with rights of the individual being ignored if the majority so decrees it. In ancient Greece, Socrates was condemned to execution by a majority of his peers simply because they did not like his teachings. The Salem witch trials were also democracy in action when a majority of the people condemned a group of young girls for supposedly practicing witchcraft. Under a democracy the rights of the individuals can be superseded if the majority decides to do so. However, if the eligible voters surrender their right of absolute majority rule to that of a freely elected group of representatives, under restrictions such as our Constitution, that is a republic. In America, the States and the Constitution have decided who is eligible to vote. Those voters then select local and national representatives to govern, while following the restrictions imposed by the Constitution.

Reviewing all this history, there is a critical element that seems to have been forgotten in America—and particularly in the rest of the world. Our republic form of government is eroding, as it has in Europe, heading toward a socialistic, fascist style of government, with more and more power transferred to the Federal government, ostensibly for control purposes, but at the price of individual freedoms. This shift of power has been necessary in some cases, due to neglect and abuses at the State and lower levels, but is resulting in federal bureaucracies that behave like despotic kings of old. It is an axiom of human beings that if they relinquish individual liberties to those above them, they never get them back without revolutionary-type actions.

The Founders understood that a republic demands virtuous, upright citizens to be capable of maintaining their hard-earned freedoms. The more freedom we desire, the more virtuous we must be. Ben Franklin noted that as nations become more corrupt and viscous, they have more need of masters. The strengthening of the Federal and State governments in recent decades means we are losing our morality.

From all this we have to conclude that our government in America—arguably the best ever devised—comes from the morality, culture, and Judeo-Christian ancestors. If you doubt this, name a country that has been better than America. Therefore, to stay at our highest level, and to improve even more, we have to be a people who are virtuous, law abiding, fiscally sound, respectful of individual rights, place property rights at high levels, maintain a solid currency, control government debts, place victim rights over that of criminals, keep families intact and make them more responsible for their children, treat all citizens equally, provide for and require adequate education of all citizens, require all government and private entities to operate according to principles of law, and promote high standards of morality among all citizens. History has demonstrated that deviance from these principles ultimately leads to the downfall of the offending society. I fear that American is now on a downward path.

We need another Jethro.

 

 

 

 

 

 

WHAT’S WRONG WITH TIGER?

What’s Wrong With Tiger?

By Joe Wilkins

Today I had a very interesting conversation with a golfing friend of mine, Punny Brittane. Like this writer, Punny is getting up in years, and no longer hits the ball as far or scores as low as he used to. But we both can still play a fair game, with occasional scores in the high 70’s, with Puny doing it more frequently than me. Today, February 25, is quite cold in Atlanta, so, instead of playing,  when we ran into each other at our golf course, Mystery Valley, in Lithonia, Georgia, we spent a couple of hours socializing.

As these things usually go, we eventually began to speculate about Tiger Wood’s game. It is evident to all, that Tiger is struggling with his game as never before, and such problems remind us of ourselves. It is an axiom of the game, that most golfers always wish they could do better, ignoring that their score on any particular day is the best that was possible at that time. It is what it is!

Punny and I finally concluded that when people take up golf for the first time, they are “blessed” with a certain level of natural ability–which varies quite widely among participants. Some people become quite skilled quickly, with others not doing so well, but they all perform initially at levels commensurate with abilities, dictated by height, weight, strength, coordination, temperament, sense of rhythm, and whatever else our DNA has given us.  And it is quite clear that Tiger got a full share of all the above.

Additionally, it is important at what age the person takes up the game. If a young golfer gets good instruction early, practices under professional supervision, likes the game, then he maximizes the abilities he was born with. However, if he takes up the game later in life, even if he is possessed with good abilities, he will likely not be able to develop as well as the younger phenom.

In any event, no matter what swing he winds up with, that swing becomes “his swing,” and once it becomes programmed in his brain and muscles, he is pretty much stuck with it for the rest of his life. And hopefully it will be a good swing, with which he will be pleased, because it cannot be changed without monumental effort, which most golfers cannot and will not do.

Given all this, Punny and I concluded that Tiger had a great swing when he first came on tour, as evidenced by the many tournaments he immediately started winning. So good was he with his total game, that he was immediately compared with the greats of the past. And he was that good! However, we concluded that he soon made a major mistake. Deep within his psyche, there was this demand to be even better–or, even perfect. Yes, Tiger was searching for the perfect swing, which we contend is an impossible task. So, after a couple of years, he began fooling around with his swing, which, fortunately, due to obsessive dedication, instruction, and practice, served him well. However, Puny and I contend that he did not do any better than he would have if he had left well enough alone and stuck with the swing that he first brought to the tour.

Eventually he got too obsessive with swing methods and theories, switched to instructors who initially bought into his Quixotic goals, and, perhaps, they too believed that the perfect swing was attainable. Tiger certainly kept on winning at a record pace, and it was predicted that he would exceed Nicklaus’ major wins easily, so it was easy to believe that he could achieve such a goal. But, alas, it is now clear that such achievement is no longer possible, due to physical injuries and growing older. There also also also may well be psychological issues, as reflected through his marital and other personal problems.

So where does that leave Tiger? Well, Punny and I are presumptive enough to offer him some suggestions. First, we think he needs to rediscover that swing he had before coming on tour. Learning-theory principles show that the old swing is still in him, and, rather than let its old memory traces inhibit any new swing changes, go ahead and make friends with it again. So, he needs to disregard all those methods that no longer work, and get his mind returned to where it was when he first came on tour. This will require acceptance,  some memory work recalling his old swing, and freeing up his “spirit.” As he goes about this process, he will soon learn that he will be unable to recapture his old swing exactly as it used to be, because of injuries and aging, which will dictate some needed modifications, but these changes should only be those which will complement the touch and feel of the old swing. An example would be, that since he has had spinal surgery, he will not be able to take the club back as far as he used to, so just let the club go where it will, while feeling in his mind the swing of his youth. The body, with its limited flexibility, will only go where it can, just let it go where it will, while keeping the feel of the  old swing.

To sum up, the “natural”  swing we are born with–or the one that was developed in our youth (hopefully under the guidance of an expert)–is the one we are stuck with the rest of our lives. Tiger seeks perfection in his golf swing, but he listens to too many different expert’s opinions as to how to achieve it. He needs to listen only to himself at this point in his life. He got all the instruction he needed when he was a youth, and he should surrender to that reality and quit trying to change something that resists changing;  instead, nurture  and accept it as a friend. To quote Catholic priest, Father David Rider, “If you are who you should be, you’ll set the world ablaze.” All striving, amateur golfers know that their basic swing rarely abandons them. And remember, golf is not a game of perfect!

FORE

BOOK REVIEW/OFFER

BOOK REVIEW/OFFER

There’s a little known secret in the world of cooking: cooking with a microwave oven is easy, efficient, healthful, and comprehensive. In fact, the microwave is very versatile, in that it can do all that  traditional ovens and stovetops can do—it just does things slightly differently. However, most people only use their microwaves to heat things up, and rarely take advantage of the creative cooking that is possible.

In the early 1980’s three professional home economists, having discovered the benefits of microwave cooking, began exploring ways to get this new technology more thoroughly introduced to the public. A few microwave cookbooks were available, but they were sketchy efforts, produced by the microwave manufacturers, and were sorely deficient in creativity, cooking expertise, variety, and other factors that make fine cooking an art.

So these three ladies decided to write their own cookbook, and to publish it themselves. Subsequently, due to their dedication and belief in this new technology, they created and tested hundreds of recipes, using their extensive knowledge and experience to put it all together in Simply Scrumptious Microwaving. To promote and sell the book they travelled the country, promoting their book at bookseller’s conventions and in bookstores. They gave cooking demonstrations wherever microwaves were sold, appeared on TV, and gave countless interviews with the press. Their sales efforts soon paid off, and the book was so successful, that Doubleday of New York and David & Charles of London picked the book up, and soon it was the most successful microwave cookbook ever. Final sales numbers were over 250,000 books sold.

This book is a classic, and is now out of print. Its legacy is that it has spawned numerous other microwave cookbooks, and now almost every home in America has a microwave oven. To ensure that creative cooks can expand their expertise beyond the traditional stove, a few original copies of this book are available to interested readers of this website.

Based on the success of Simply Scrumptious Microwaving, and Simply Scrumptious Microwaving For Children (no longer available), a third book was written, The Microwave Cook’s Complete Companion (over 700 recipes), which expanded the options of the original book. Both books are now available and can be ordered by sending check or money order to Lorela N. Wilkins, 5544 Stonehaven Drive, Stone Mountain, Ga, 30087. Simply Scrumptious Microwaving, 214 pages, is $20.00, and The Microwave Cook’s Complete Companion, 484 pages, is $24.95. Shipping is free.

BOOK REVIEW

BOOK REVIEW

“COMING APART” (The State of White America, 1960-2010)   by Charles Murray, Ph.D

If the reader is a lover of the American way of life as envisioned by the Founding Fathers, and you’re wondering where in the hell things are going wrong, this book will answer most of your questions. In this reviewer’s opinion, it is one of the most important books in recent years.

Every reflective American now knows that our way of life has drastically changed since World War II—and not for the better in important ways. The institutions that formerly held our nation together are collapsing, and making most Americans feel as if they are adrift in a lifeboat without oars. It’s getting harder to make long term plans, and many must live their lives “one-day-at-a-time.”

Dr. Murray, with degrees in history and political science, is well qualified to address the current American condition, both as to what is going wrong and what must be done to fix things. He reports how things have slowly—and often without our understanding—morphed into a nation that is losing the institutions and values that have served us so well in the past. He recognizes that we are not a perfect society, and have had major problems, but we still became the best nation on earth, and are still striving to keep that crown. However, the loss of individual industriousness, marital failures, collapse of the public school system, less honesty, decline in religiosity, and other factors are eroding our country.

Perhaps he can best be summed up from a quote in this book: “To be a man means that you are brave, loyal, and true. When you are in the wrong, you own up and take your punishment. You don’t take advantage of women. As a husband, you support and protect your wife and children. You are gracious in victory and a good sport in defeat. Your word is your bond. Your handshake is as good as your word. It’s not whether you win or lose, but how you play the game. When the ship goes down, you put the women and children into the lifeboats and wave goodbye with a smile.”

Though this paragraph is loaded with clichés, as he admits, “… they were clichés precisely because boys understood that this was the way they were supposed to behave.” Ladies had similar codes, and together they kept America moving in a good direction.

If the book has a central theme it is that the creative and industrious white population in America has been adopting and internalizing many of the values of the lower classes, values which are dragging all of us down to lower standards. The implication is that these lower values need to be elevated to higher levels, so that America can still become the beacon for the world that the Founding Fathers had hoped for.

Though the style of the book is somewhat academic, with the usual appendices, notes, bibliography, and index, he has made a complex subject as readable as possible for the general public. There are also many charts and graphs, which are helpful, but can be skipped most of the time.

If you want to know what’s going on in America, you need this book. See your local booksellers, Amazon.com., etc.

Joe Wilkins, reviewer